User talk:Ktims

Request Map[edit]

Hi,

I see you've added an SVG image of the Khanda. I was wondering if you're interested in doing the same for a map, based on a non-SVG map?

Thanks and welcome (back?) to Wikipedia! Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 20:06, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be willing to give it a shot, but I'm really not a vector graphics artist or GIS person, the Khanda is simple geometrically, so doing a Trace Bitmap worked out pretty well, and I could just tweak some of the corners a bit. I'm not sure the same would be true of a map, but I can give it a try. Which map were you wanting done?

If you could try that'd be excellent!

Basically I require a map like [1] (see "Punjab in 1966:"). This shows the Punjab area of India and Pakistan when it was unified in British India. It then shows the current divisions in the respective countries.

Once this outline is done, I would like to use several derived maps by colouring in particular states and divisions. If you could do this, it would be a huge help! Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 23:33, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not totally clear on the difference between the 1966 and current maps. The divisions of Punjab seem to be identical.

Yes they're identical, but the 1966 map doesn't have lots of city names so should be easier to copy from? If you wish to use city names, then please add Islamabad (Capital), Lahore, Amritsar, Chandigarh and New Delhi (Capital).Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 12:14, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

The map looks great! Thanks! Is it possible to make derived maps with certain states coloured in? Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 20:53, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It should be pretty easy, let me know what you want or make a mockup or something :) --Ktims 06:48, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, ace! By the way, I've noticed a slight problem with the Pakistan map. Islamabad is like a union territory so can that be in its own dotted circle like Delhi/Chandigarh?

These are the maps that would be good:

Greater Punjab area - Make Pakistan Punjab, HP, Haryana, Indian Punjab and Chandigarh the same colour. Maybe having a similar but lighter colour for Delhi.
Indian Punjab area - Same as above, except don't include Pakistani Punjab.

I've also got an idea for a linguistic map, but we can have a look at that later! Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 18:38, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New Black Tusk Pics[edit]

I like the new Black Tusk pics a lot, and I like the new gallery section. --R

Transparency[edit]

The background was copied from the Commons where it has been very successful. For the cases where it does cause a problem, it is much easier to click on the image to see it on a white background, that in it is to load it up in an image editor to see the transparency, were we not to have it. If you like, take it up on the talk page, but I get the feeling that more people like it than dislike it, and so it should be enabled by default. ed g2s • talk 14:04, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quite, although diagrams in SVG should be suitable filled in - so the background shows us where these files need to be fixed... ed g2s • talk 14:37, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Manchester_test.svg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Manchester_test.svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:42, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Mp3_rules_2005-03-03.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Mp3_rules_2005-03-03.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:22, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Sinh_cosh_tanh.svg[edit]

Hi I think is is very nice.I have dovnload gnuplot but I can not make anything (I sorry) can you made Sin_asin.svg and another trigionometrik funktion.Thanks!--Jaro.p 08:16, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Taylorsine.svg[edit]

(originally this meessage was written to Jaro.p as I thought it was him who made the picture)

Hi. Thank you for the picture Image:Taylorsine.svg you created. One request. Would you mind making the curves in the picture thicker, so that the picture does not appear so blurry? Same for the axes, and a bit larger fonts won't hurt either. Sorry to bug you, your work is appreciated, but if we can make it look nicer it will be even better. Thanks, you can reply here if you have comments. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:09, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Same about Image:Sin asin.svg. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 16:42, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:SVG render test.svg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:SVG render test.svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:05, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Brown noise spectrum.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Brown noise spectrum.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — User:ACupOfCoffee @ 06:24, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

wikEd[edit]

The wikEdlogo

Hi, I have seen that you are using the Cacycle editor extension. This program is no longer actively maintained in favor of its much more powerful successor wikEd.

wikEd has all the functionality of the old editor plus:• syntax highlighting • nifty image buttons • morefixing buttons • paste formatted text from Word or web pages• convert the formatted text into wikicode • adjustthe font size • and much, much more.

Switching to wikEd is easy, check the detailed installation description on its project homepage. Usually it is as simple as changing every occurrence of editor.js into wikEd.js on your User:YourUsername/monobook.js page.

Cacycle 21:42, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:CTV logo.svg[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:CTV logo.svg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Cavenba 20:22, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Rnzaf roundel.svg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Rnzaf roundel.svg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jackaranga 10:03, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

United States Army enlisted rank insignia of World War II[edit]

Thanks for providing the svg's. Any chance you might be able to also whip up examples of the unauthorized pre-1942 specialist insignias? This page has examples with specialty devices, but even plain ones without such devices, just the extra arcs, would be much appreciated. Caerwine Caer’s whines 22:02, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would be nice to have them, but I don't really want to create generic ones since IMO they wouldn't be usable in the article, and the quality of the specialty images at that source is not good enough to produce a decent looking vectorized version. I'm also not sure about the copyright status since these representations are not created by USGov. Any chance the specialty emblems are available elsewhere with higher quality? Perhaps the emblems are on some other insignia that already have SVGs on wiki somewhere? --Ktims 22:10, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK so a couple of these are pretty obvious. Actually it looks like they're all here already (except cook): Branch_insignia_of_the_United_States_Army. They aren't vectorized but the quality is fairly good so it shouldn't be too bad. I'll give it a go if I remember... --Ktims 22:28, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, except that judging by the given examples, the specialty devices should probably match the stripes in color as much as possible. Thus the wings should probably be the same color as the stripes. The official World War I Era insignia appear to have used single color devices on insignia, even in the case of signalmen, where a multicolor branch symbol existed. The Cook and Mechanic devices appear to be the same as those used officially during World War I, but they weren't part of any specific branch. The Ordinance and Quartermaster devices would be appropriate substitutes for the Mechanic and Cook devices if you intend to substitute, but the Mechanic and Cook also be nice to have if you ever want to tackle the World War I enlisted insignia, as they were official then. I'm leery of leaving the 6th Class as the only plain one as you suggest. It would leave the false impression to someone who only scanned the pictures that it was "supposed" to be plain while the others had the device. That appears to be not the case. Since they were unofficial, they likely had a number of variations range from plain ones with no device, with a monocolor device, all the way up to a full color embroidered version of the device for soldiers willing to pay for them. Caerwine Caer’s whines 19:14, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Blackcomblogo.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Blackcomblogo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:White noise spectrum.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:White noise spectrum.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:34, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:VFS Logo.svg)[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:VFS Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Zoo Fari 00:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BCIT Logo.svg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BCIT Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 11:32, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Cap code screenshot.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cap code screenshot.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:36, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Phoenician G.svg missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Phoenician G.svg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:13, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vancouver Wikipedia 10th Anniversary Meetup[edit]

The Interior cordially invites you to the Vancouver Wikipedia 10th Anniversary Meetup! It is being held at Benny's Bagels at 2505 W Broadway. Meetup will start at 6:30pm. Drop by for some Wikipedia-style conviviality and free gear! Feel free to forward this invitation to any Wikipedians who might be able to attend, and visit the discussion page to suggest activities. Hope to see you there and have a Happy 2011!

Speedy deletion nomination of File:United States AR seal.png[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:United States AR seal.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:40, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to Vancouver meetup[edit]

Hello,

Wikipedian British Columbians are planning a meetup at the Vancouver Public Library, Central Branch, on Sunday, October 16th, as part of the Wikipedia Loves Libraries events. If you wish to attend, please see Wikipedia:Meetup/Vancouver and add your signature to the list.

Thank you! InverseHypercube 03:05, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to Vancouver meetup[edit]

Hello,

You are invited to an edit-a-thon at the Prophouse Café on Sunday March 25, as part of Women's History Month events all over the world. If you wish to attend, please see Wikipedia:Meetup/Vancouver WikiWomen's Edit-a-Thon and add your signature to the list.

Thank you! InverseHypercube (talk) 09:39, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flat.svg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flat.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:37, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Test svgplot.svg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Test svgplot.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:14, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Ktims. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 12, 2019 edit-a-thon at "Atla Annual 2019" in Vancouver British Columbia[edit]

1000 Women in Religion: A Wikipedia edit-a-thon at "Atla Annual 2019" in Vancouver, British Columbia

The 1000 Women in Religion Project is working to improve the coverage of women’s contributions to religious, spiritual and wisdom traditions worldwide. In support of this goal, the edit-a-thon at Atla's (formerly the American Theological Library Association) annual meeting will focus on improving articles about women in religion. We would love to have a few Vancouver area Wikipedians to help us get new editors oriented and editing!!

Wednesday, June 12, 2019
8:00am-12:00pm
Sheraton Vancouver Wall Centre
1088 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 2R9 Canada

For more details or to sign up, see: Wikipedia edit-a-thon at "Atla Annual Meeting" in Vancouver, British Columbia. For security reasons everyone attending the edit-a-thon must pre-register with Atla here or on our Vancouver Meetup page by May 31st.
For questions, please contact: Dzingle1

Dzingle1 (talk) 02:39, 25 May 2019 (UTC)Dzingle1 (talk) 21:16, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nuclear mp3rules.png listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nuclear mp3rules.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]