User talk:Koopnasty

12/6/2018 Evaluation by NBasham1

Spelling/Grammar: Nearly Meets Standards

• Mostly good, there are some run on sentences like the second to last sentence in integration. Over is capitalized incorrectly in the first paragraph. Just give each paragraph a once-over to make sure

Language: Meets Standards

• Seems good overall. Might want to tighten up professionalism on the first sentence of political response (receive hate).

Organization: Meets Standards

• The piece is well-organized. Remove spaces before and after history heading.

Coding: Nearly Meets Standards

• Need to put a Section Header for the Reference part

Validity: Exceeds Standards

• Everything seems valid

Completion: Meets Standards

• I can't think of anything to add

Relevance: Exceeds Standards

• All parts seem relevant to the topic.

Sources: Nearly Meets Standards

• The sources you have are good and what you'd expect, you're just short 4.

Citations: Meets Standards

• Don't see a problem here

References: Meets Standards

• Reference section is good.

Welcome!

Hello, Koopnasty, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:29, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

12/6/18 Evaluation by Forrest C. Bevington

Spelling/Grammar: Nearly Meets Standards

• The first paragraph has good information, but there seems to be quite a few run on sentences with multiple grammar mistakes.

Language: Meets Standards

• The language in your piece is good, but I think you could word your sentences better to create a better flow throughout your edit.

Organization: Meets Standards

• Excellent organization, the only thing I would change is the placement of the "Status Of Urkrainians in Poland" and "Documents for Foreigners" like try to center those two to look better in terms of presentation.

Coding: Exceeds Standards

• I don't see any issues with your code.

Validity: Exceeds Standards

• Your information seems to be very valid with great information.

Completion: Exceeds Standards

• Your piece is well written with great information. Not sure I see anything else that needs to be added.

Relevance: Meets Standards

• Information is relevant to the topic of choice.

Sources: Nearly Meets Standards

• You only have 16 so you need four more sources, but other than that sources look good.

Citations: Meets Standards

• Great citations throughout your piece, but as mentioned above, you need 4 more sources.

References: Meets Standards

• The references look good throughout your piece, but you could add a few more to create more professionalism.