User talk:Klymat

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In response to your feedback[edit]

Semi-protection is when a page is vandalized a lot usually. This makes it so that unregistered users and new users can't edit them. However, you can place a request on the talk page to tell everyone that the page should be edited. Once you've been on Wikipedia for 4 days, and made 10 edits, you can edit any semi-protected page. If you have questions, come to my talk page.

iXavier [talk|contribs] 04:12, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 

Also, to tell if something is semi-protected, check for this icon in the top-right: iXavier [talk|contribs] 04:14, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chat Forum[edit]

Feel free to forum here, but please make sure to keep it on nice things, no bad words!:)

Klymat, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Klymat! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Hajatvrc (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Roblox[edit]

You play roblox, what's your username? iXavier [talk|edits|logs] 03:57, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is you, right? ZappaOMati 00:27, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2013[edit]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2013
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2013, the project has:


Content


Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

Your mass edit to the Roblox page[edit]

G'day Kly. I have reverted your edit to the article Roblox because it did not promote the use of proper grammar, did not comply with WP:MoS, and you had added some surplus information (in other words, un-encyclopedic details). If you have any questions about my revert, you are welcome to talk to me on my Talkpage. Cheers, Kevin12xd (contribs) 00:49, 5 June 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Article Feedback Tool update[edit]

Hey Klymat. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.

We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.

Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 22:00, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Roblox may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • also allows the player's original name to be saved in case a user wishes to change back. <ref>{{cite news|last=Medhora|first=Chirag|url=http://blog.roblox.com/2013/10/tired-of-your-username-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:49, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Robloxlogo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Robloxlogo.jpg, which you've attributed to (Logo). I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:27, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ROBLOXTourLogo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ROBLOXTourLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:42, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Robloxian2.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Robloxian2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Kalama Epstein, 2016.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Kalama Epstein, 2016.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:53, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]