User talk:K.S.Morgan

Please stop posting false information.

“Significant other” means a person with whom you have an *established* romantic and sexual relationship.

“Flirting” and/or one-sided feelings do not count. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VictimOfEntropy (talk • contribs) 20:26, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

K.S.Morgan, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi K.S.Morgan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

March 2018[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Dark Knight 2149 19:18, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly - so, please stop removing edits that are fully supported by information provided in the appropriate category. K.S.Morgan (talk) 19:25, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good God. Not only have you failed to provide any links or legit sources to this "appropriate category" (and I have a feeling you are confusing the Wikipedia term "Category" with something else), but you have continued to revert even after it was pointed out to you that I had brought this up on the Talk Page two days ago (from which you still have not replied). The part of this warning you should especially heed is "...even if you believe you are right." This sort of behaviour and refusal to discuss matters on the Talk Page will get you blocked, if continued. Dark Knight 2149 19:45, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lol. What do you have against links to official interview with Bryan Fuller, the creator of the show, and to the episodes themselves? If you somehow missed the point of the show, the collected information tells everything you need. Yes, Will and Hannibal have romantic feelings for each other. sexuality was hinted at, too - considering Bryan' words about 'meeting a person who makes you reconsider the lines of your own sexuality' and others. He called it a 'romance', not bromance (which is just queerbaiting), again and again. He discussed their sexual positions, for God' sake. so, what are you disagreeing with here? As for talk page - sorry, I can't access it for some reason. Trying to solve it currently.K.S.Morgan (talk) 19:55, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Added reply to the talk page as well. K.S.Morgan (talk) 20:35, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Hannibal Lecter. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. ——SerialNumber54129 18:32, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]