User talk:Joostvandeputte~enwiki

Welcome!

Hello, Joostvandeputte~enwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Melchoir 21:21, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Google books[edit]

Please read WP:EL. We don't link to Google books. It is a site which requires registration and login to access. IPSOS (talk) 20:41, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am pretty sure it has been decided not to link to Google books. It's not necessary, just make a proper bibliographic entry. Also, it is considered bad form to add references when you are not actually adding any content from the reference. Take it up on the help desk or something. I think you are doing something wrong, and it is your responsibility to follow up on it. IPSOS (talk) 21:04, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You will also want to note that Wikipedia prohibits directly linking to sites which sell the books, even affiliate sites. When you link to copyighted books on Google books, non-logged in users get a set of book sales links. Wikipedia provides a single way to link to modern books, by ISBN number only. Clicking on the ISBN number takes you to a page where you can select many destinations based on that ISBN, such as Amazon, Google books, etc., so as to prevent the promotion of a single site and to give the reader access to all options not just one. It may be permissable to link out-of-copyright books with no ISBN to Google, but you should ask at the help desk, village pump or another related talk page. IPSOS (talk) 21:14, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we don't really forgo it, since you can easily get there from the ISBN. For example, click on this ISBN 9004129022. Then search in the page for "Google books" and click on the "Find this book" link. Also, as I said, it may be ok to link to out of print books in the public domain, as Google doesn't make you log in to view those. I don't know for sure, though... IPSOS (talk) 15:19, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hospital[edit]

Thanks for your addition to Hospital. Can you please provide (English-language) references for it? Cheers. MadMaxDog 22:15, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Electronic Shelf Label[edit]

I have nominated Electronic Shelf Label, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electronic Shelf Label. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? rootology (T) 03:28, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

James N. Gardner listed at RfD[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect James N. Gardner. Since you had some involvement with the James N. Gardner redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Six (talk) 11:58, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Georg Andreas Böckler[edit]

Hi there. Would you be able to answer the question I have asked at Talk:Georg Andreas Böckler#Birth and death years? If I don't hear anything in a few days, will try and ask at the Dutch Wikipedia. Carcharoth (talk) 10:51, 2 July 2012 (UTC) Update: I checked here, but as the last edits there were in 2011 as well, I'll not post there and just leave it at this note.[reply]

Mo Chua of Balla[edit]

I have removed a statement that you made in the article Mo Chua of Balla because it was unreferenced. Please find a reference for about the teleportation of meat by St Mo Chua, and then you could put the sentence back again. Kind regards--File Éireann 07:58, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed[edit]

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Joostvandeputte. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Joostvandeputte~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

00:57, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed[edit]

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

14:35, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dirk Martens has been nominated for Did You Know[edit]

Hello, Joostvandeputte~enwiki. Dirk Martens, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 01:46, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Dirk Martens[edit]

On 8 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dirk Martens, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Dirk Martens published the first edition of Thomas More's Utopia in 1516? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dirk Martens. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ReadPlease for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ReadPlease is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ReadPlease until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 23:40, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fire Vox[edit]

The article Fire Vox has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anton.bersh (talk) 11:27, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]