User talk:Jmecholsky

I am interested in maintaining articles that pertain to Agile Management. Jmecholsky (talk)

November 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Agile management may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

are also links to [[lean project management|lean techniques]], [[Kanban]]{{Nihongo||かんばん(看板)}}]] and [[Six Sigma]].{{ref|1=[http://cprime.eleapcourses.com/courses/view?id=11363 Interest in the

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:18, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC eXtreme Manufacturing was accepted[edit]

eXtreme Manufacturing, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

ES &L 22:00, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Extreme Manufacturing (December 27)[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Extreme Manufacturing.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! APerson (talk!) 23:52, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/eXtreme Manufacturing concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/eXtreme Manufacturing, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/eXtreme Manufacturing[edit]

Hello Jmecholsky. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "eXtreme Manufacturing".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/eXtreme Manufacturing}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 06:11, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Extreme Manufacturing concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Extreme Manufacturing, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey John[edit]

Know you from Linked In. I edited the Extreme Manufacturing article today, after listing to Justice at the Scrum Alliance's Learning Consortium monthly webinars. No disrespect intended, just wanted to begin moving the article toward standard acceptable WP encyclopedic content (which means better sourcing, and other standards related to the lead). The tags are in to call attention to places where ideas need better explanation, or sources (in particular, where we can give sources that will be long-lasting (i.e., reputable third party sourced content moreso than self-published/blog content). By the way, Justice said "good basic content" about this article, today, in his talk. Le Prof [User:Leprof_7272] 73.210.154.39 (talk) 21:48, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Three circle intersection image[edit]

It seems to me the perfect explanatory image for this article would be the Justice-used image of the three circles (Scrum, XP, OOA), showing XM as the intersection between them. Any thought on how we might get one uploaded? Cheers. Le Prof 73.210.154.39 (talk) 04:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Justice and the circle graphic[edit]

I have no issues with updates and additions that make sense. Joe and I discussed this article quite a bit when it was in the earlier stages. We agreed that more authors and better sources were the goal. The major difficulty when I authored the piece originally was that there were very few peer reviewed sources that mention XM.

Regarding the graphic, I would recommend asking Joe for it if it his content. We could recreate it if it is in the public domain. Jmecholsky (talk) 01:28, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Got it thanks. Let's both keep an eye, and add content as articles as become available. If you are in more direct contact with Joe than I am, you can tell him how to get on here, and just have him post citations/links at the Talk page of the article. That way we each can do what we do best -- he keeping up-to-date information flowing, and we making sure when it goes in, it is encyclopedic. Cheers / bonne chance, hope to cross paths in a world made of other than 1's and 0's.

Oh, and if you can get an image from him free of copyright, and get it on to commons, I will work it into the article. I already have a description of it in the lead, but a picture is worth a thousand…

Le Prof 73.210.154.39 (talk) 09:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]