User talk:Jabencarsey

Welcome!

Hello, Jabencarsey, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair | Talk 11:37, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Book template[edit]

Hi Jabencarsey, good job on the book template, I was thinking of creating one myself but you've spared me the effort! I'll try to think of ways to improve it & then start using it... Mikkerpikker 14:40, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD for Didier Breton[edit]

I see that you redirected the deletion page of the article in question to that of John MacBain's. Create the page in question and please care explain if you considered your action correct. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 18:24, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understood the logic later. Sorry for the confusion. Mea culpa. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 18:29, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

no problem... Jabencarsey 05:49, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Divine is POV[edit]

I've reverted your "Divine is POV" change on New_Simplified_Bible. Maybe the phrase "Divine Name" is a bit heavy, but I think it's not really POV, since it's merely stating that the name "Jehovah" is the name which is used for God (rather than say the name for one of the disciples, or an Old Testament prophet, or my great uncle's best mate).

Protocol[edit]

To end the merge, since it seems no one is supporting it, just remove the merge tags (or, better, comment them out and leave a request that anyone who wants to re-activate them, they should contact you first). DS 22:09, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Nanjing Byosoft[edit]

A tag has been placed on Nanjing Byosoft, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Finngall ^talk 15:53, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:UEFI logo.gif[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:UEFI logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:37, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Logo dig64.jpg[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo dig64.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:32, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Logo dig64.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo dig64.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:22, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:UEFI logo.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:UEFI logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:45, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

QDeck[edit]

Hi Jaben. Good morning. --WikiCats (talk) 22:28, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: stub categories...[edit]

I am new to stub sorting, and I was not aware of the difference. Can you clue me in on the best way to add stub tags?--Wloveral (talk) 01:39, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering about the difference. Curly braces it is, then, and within the article, too. I will check out the wikiproject page on stub sorting that you mentioned. Thanks for your help.--Wloveral (talk) 01:53, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Jabencarsey! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 941 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Dave Holland (Klansman) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:30, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of shopping malls in Romania[edit]

The article List of shopping malls in Romania has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unmaintainable and unencyclopedic list lacking in sourcing and consisting primarily of redlinks

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Divebomb is not British 19:32, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of shopping malls in Romania for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article List of shopping malls in Romania, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of shopping malls in Romania until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Divebomb is not British 19:55, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]