User talk:Ioooi

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Ioooi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Talk:Respiratory exchange ratio. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Longhair\^talk 12:26, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 02:43, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ioooi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Clearly there was no reason for me to be blocked, because I have not caused any damage or "disruption" to the dictionary. Ioooi (talk) 22:12, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are confused. This is not a dictionary and your edits here have been disruptive. Yamla (talk) 22:19, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: I am sorry, in my language "dictionary" and "encyclopedia" are the same thing, and that is why I used those words as identicals.

I have checked all my edits prior to the ban, and I have not found anything that could be even close to being considered "disruptive" or "damaging". There are literally almost identical texts from other contributors in the talk pages I added my comments to, which have not lead to bans. It is a wonder that my specific comments about that Wikipedia article defining most MSM sources (including BBC and the Finnish Government media YLE) as "Nazi sources", because they have published articles that meet the definition of "Nazism" in that article. Here are two examples of articles that would immediatelly label the BBC and the YLE as "Nazi sources":

https://yle.fi/a/3-7554385 https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-29760212

I do not think that pointing out the fact that the "No Nazis" -article clearly would categorize government medias as "Nazi sources" is not "damaging" or "disruptive" to "the encyclopedia project" in any way. In fact, I think this is a very positive contribution.

I suggest the moderators checking this out reading the other comments in the "talk" section, and comparing them to mine. It is a wonder why I got permanently banned for saying the same kinds of things that the others were saying.

Ioooi (talk) 22:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]