User talk:Imstjimmy

Welcome!

Hello, Imstjimmy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! HG | Talk 11:35, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Crystal Insights, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Wikidudeman ^(talk) 21:21, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

stargate horizons[edit]

Hi. Be sure to give info about why this subject is notable (enough for wikipedia). It should not read simply like an ad for the program. Are you associated with it? Good luck. HG | Talk 11:10, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. You might look at WP:Notability and some of the welcome info I've placed above. Before you spend much time on the article, you may want to see if the episodes/program show up in any verifiable news articles or otherwise can be shown to be important. Another idea is to look at similar programs in this category and see how those articles are done (I don't know the category, sorry). (Follow the links given here.) Good luck. HG | Talk 11:45, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:E Dataline i5 dataline Temp t005960001.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:E Dataline i5 dataline Temp t005960001.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:08, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stargate Horizon[edit]

A tag has been placed on Stargate Horizon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Bastun^{BaStun not BaTsun} 14:11, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have concerns about the article above. On checking, 'Stargate Horizon' appears to be a fanfiction website/project. However, the article you've created gives the impression (despite a couple of 'disclaimer' sentences) that its a real TV show. As a website, its quite likely that 'Stargate Horizon' doesn't meet the requirements of WP:WEB. Could you have a read of those criteria, and if you disagree, use the 'hangon' tag as per the template above? It would also help to rewrite the introduction to make it clear that its fanfiction, and not use the TV infobox. Regards, Bastun^{BaStun not BaTsun} 14:41, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've put a temporary hold (aka "hangon") for the article. You may want to try to get in touch with folks with the wikiproject Stargate (here: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stargate to see if they would agree about keeping the article. Meanwhile, maybe you'll enjoy working on other articles. Good luck. HG | Talk 14:52, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Horizon02.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Horizon02.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:24, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Bowl1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bowl1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:07, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Horizon02.jpg[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Horizon02.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:41, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:E Dataline i5 dataline Temp t005960001.jpg[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:E Dataline i5 dataline Temp t005960001.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:45, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Bowl2.jpg[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bowl2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:54, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Bowl1.jpg[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bowl1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:55, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD you may care about[edit]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Characters in Stargate — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 14:15, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of YouTube celebrities[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to List of YouTube celebrities‎, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Netsnipe ► 10:16, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:24, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Plasticdogs[edit]

A tag has been placed on Plasticdogs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. L. Pistachio (talk) 18:37, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Plasticdogs[edit]

A tag has been placed on Plasticdogs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 18:42, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Plasticdogs[edit]

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created, as you did with Plasticdogs. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 18:55, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:34, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Hop Farm Festival, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages George Clinton and Ian Hunter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]