User talk:Idastorehaug

Your submission at Articles for creation: André Lagarrigue has been accepted

André Lagarrigue, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KSFT ^(t|c) 15:38, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Idastorehaug, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Idastorehaug! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:02, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Proton-Antiproton Collider, from its old location at User:Idastorehaug/Proton-Antiproton Collider. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I've been doing} 16:37, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Proton-Antiproton Collider (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Naraht was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Proton-Antiproton Collider and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Naraht (talk) 20:10, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Blanking

In this edit to UA2 experiment, you deleted an entire paragraph of sourced material with no explanation. There may well be a valid reason to delete this paragraph, but you should discuss it first before deleting the material. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:00, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

WikiDan61, I deleted it because it concerned the Draft: Proton-Antiproton Collider, and I moved the paragraphs there. Next time I will make a comment - thank you for the reminder. Idastorehaug (talk) 15:40, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Proton-Antiproton Collider

When you first created Proton-Antiproton Collider, it consisted of a single paragraph with insufficient information to distinguish it from the information contained at Super Proton Synchrotron. However, your expansion in the draft space has certainly improved on that first effort. I would recommend using the requested moves process to request that your draft be moved to Proton-Antiproton Collider over the existing redirect. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:05, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Idastorehaug, I'm responding here to keep things between, you and I and WikiDan61 in one place. I agree with you and Dan in regards to that it is substantial enough to stand on its own. Given that the redirect actually has some history to it, I can't do it by myself. I will however comment on the Draft page that I am OK with it being moved to mainspace. I'll include a reference to this thread which, I think, should be enough for someone who can do the move doing so.Naraht (talk) 15:07, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Naraht, Thank you both for positive response! This is a new situation for me, and I do not completely understand if I need to do something to request the move? I can see that you edited into the Request move?Idastorehaug (talk) 15:36, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Idastorehaug, WikiDan61. (Fixed some things in this thread. I've done the REQMOVE, now we just wait (a short amount of time). If it hasn't happened by Wednesday, I'll see what else I can do.Naraht (talk) 16:22, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Been moved

WikiDan61, Idastorehaug Well, it was moved, but not quite as expected. It was moved to Proton-Antiproton Collider and then moved to Proton–Antiproton Collider which has an endash rather than the original hyphen. I think that we're done now. :)Naraht (talk) 20:26, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Proton-Antiproton Collider has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Proton-Antiproton Collider. Thanks! Naraht (talk) 15:11, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (UA4 experiment) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating UA4 experiment, Idastorehaug!

Wikipedia editor DrStrauss just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hi, it's so refreshing to review a page and not put any tags on it! Thank you for your contributions :)

To reply, leave a comment on DrStrauss's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

DrStrauss talk 09:17, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

CERN Linacs

Hi. First off, thanks for your monster efforts in creating and expanding historical CERN-related articles. I for one really appreciate it. I noticed on your user page a link to User:Idastorehaug/Linac. I just want to point you to the existing page, if you haven't already found it: CERN Hadron LINACs. — dukwon (talk) (contribs) 17:16, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

John Rushbrbrooke

Is there any particular reason you'dlike it deleted? He seems notable, and the article is straightforward? I'm holding off on deletion a littlre while for your reply DGG ( talk ) 18:42, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

DGG, The article has already been published here John Gordon Rushbrooke, so this is an old draft I forgot to delete. I would appreciate if you could delete it. Idastorehaug (talk) 18:45, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

sure. Will delete. DGG ( talk ) 18:47, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

UA5 experiment

Thanks for creating the article UA5 experiment. That's a real walk down memory lane for me as I was actually a very junior member of the UA5 physics team all those years ago. I'd be interested to know how you got interested in writing up the work being done at CERN back then. MichaelMaggs (talk) 22:02, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Idastorehaug. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Idastorehaug. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)