User talk:ICarlyous

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, ICarlyous, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 18:11, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from List of Hannah Montana episodes. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 18:11, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Hannah Montana Forever (series)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Hannah Montana Forever (series). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Hannah Montana (season 4). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Hannah Montana (season 4) - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.

Hannah Montana Forever is, by consensus of editors, the fourth season of Hannah Montana and not a separate series. If you think the issue needs to be revisited, open discussion at Talk:Hannah Montana. However, do not delete content from the Hannah Montana articles or copy-paste move articles to new titles. —C.Fred (talk) 18:17, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your request at Talk:Hannah Montana (season 4)[edit]

Greetings! I see you requested a change to the Hannah Montana season 4 article at Talk:Hannah Montana (season 4). However, your request was unclear. Because you copied in the text of the article, it's not easy to assess what should be changed. As a result, your changes were not made.

If you think changes need to be made, please make specific requests (e.g., "Change April 1 to April 2") and provide reliable sources to support the changes. —C.Fred (talk) 18:39, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Millie Redfearn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mhiji 18:56, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Big Mommas: Like Father, Like Son. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 01:53, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011 (2)[edit]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Peggy Mitchell. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AnemoneProjectors 23:02, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to ICarly (season 4). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 19:49, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Also, be very careful when removing maintenance tags, as you did from Big Mommas: Like Father, Like Son. Do not remove tags that still apply to the article—such as the tag noting that the article is supported by a single reference, which is still the case. —C.Fred (talk) 21:01, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to List of EastEnders characters (2011), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. AnemoneProjectors 00:49, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Carey Martin, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. AussieLegend (talk) 16:16, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nlu (talk) 20:08, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]