User talk:Henry01301

This is Henry01301's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wendy Sibbison (November 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wendy Sibbison and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 04:01, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MurielMary -- Thank you for reviewing the Wendy Sibbison article. I'm completely new to Wikipedia and am afraid that I don't totally understand the vocabulary. It seems that the objection is to the references not being reliable secondary sources -- is that the main problem? Or is it the text of the article itself? Or have I taken the wrong approach for an article on a living person? Frankly, the help files are a bit overwhelming.

I am a former client of Ms Sibbison and live in the same city and I tried to interview her for the details of her life for this article. I would like to continue to edit this article for resubmission but an not sure of the best approach to getting help. I see the link to the Teahouse but also have seen there are "mentors". Do you have any suggestions along this line? Any help appreciated. Henry01301 (talk) 13:31, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I've added some detail to the draft to give some more information about the reasons for the decline. Hope that helps! I recommend asking questions at the Teahouse are there are very helpful editors there who will definitely help you out. I don't know anything about finding a mentor, sorry. MurielMary (talk) 08:18, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Henry01301! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MurielMary (talk) 04:01, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Wendy Sibbison has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Wendy Sibbison. Thanks! MurielMary (talk) 08:14, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you MurielMary -- I did put out a Teahouse question and have already received some useful feedback -- and I appreciate your taking the time to comment on the sandbox article. I'm learning -- and am very impressed with the support from the community. Thanks again. Henry01301 (talk) 22:00, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Henry01301. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft talk:Wendy Sibbison, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. While you noted it (thank you), please make the appropriate disclosures on your userpage. Star Mississippi 22:37, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Star Mississippi for the prompt response. I should have been a bit more precise. As I stated in the submission, I am a former client of Ms Sibbison and live in the same town. I felt that her career establishing the first appellate law firm in MA, along with a number of precedent-setting (and law-changing, really) cases made her notable. She has also recently published a book. I am not an employee, colleague nor a close friend. I had a broad knowledge of her career (prior to retirement) but I am not a lawyer and given Wikipedia's standards of references, I looked to her to provide details, which I rephrased. Putting aside notability, does this all qualify as a conflict of interest on my part? Henry01301 (talk) 23:39, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's borderline @Henry01301 but to be safe, I think you should especially sine you note you looked to her to provide details. Let me know if that's helpful. Star Mississippi 23:44, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure I understand -- where do you recommend I include that I interviewed her for clarification of details? In the article itself? Henry01301 (talk) 02:23, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here you go: Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest#How_to_disclose_a_COI. I'd recommend the Draft talk. That's where you mentioned it, but a more clear declaration so others see it would be helpful. Star Mississippi 02:40, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Wendy Sibbison[edit]

Hello, Henry01301. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wendy Sibbison, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]