User talk:Hekerui/Archive 9
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Independent Music Awards
Sure I only changed it over from a speedy CfD request from Category:Independent Music Awards Winners to Category:Independent Music Awards winners when I noticed that the category only had two entries and I decided to fill it out. If you think that it should be deleted, I suggested that you bring it up at CfD. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:51, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Lembo
The middle initial seems to be commonly used. See use of middle initial on official website here, in title of testimony here, in signature on official document here. Indeed, a Google search reveals 9,060 hits for "Kevin Lumbo" and 9,780 for "Kevin P. Lumbo." I think the use of the "P." fits in best with our naming conventions on people. Thanks, Neutralitytalk 01:08, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Geethali Norah Jones Shankar
Hello! Norah Jones' birthname is listed as Geethali Norah Jones Shankar, that's evidence enough for me that her parents used the name, and the Geethali Shankar parts of her name surely aren't American – I assume their Bengali, yes? If so, why shouldn't there be a Bengali transliteration of her name? I would bet money that her father used it! Ashanda (talk) 13:38, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Peer review
Hello Hekerui. I have put Thomas Beecham up for peer review with a view to getting the article to FA standard. I'd be most grateful for any comments you might have - particularly on the images, but also on anything else. No hurry with this. Tim riley (talk) 17:33, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry about this. A drive-by editor has thought fit to close the PR after less than 2 days and has, for some inexplicable reason, nominated the article for FA. I have naturally opposed the nomination as premature (some might also say discourteous, but let it pass) and will get the PR reinstated as soon as I can. Meanwhile, sorry you are being mucked about by this other editor. Tim riley (talk) 10:23, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Sockpuppets
Hi, I've open a sockpuppet case about User:ConcernedPhotographer. I have thought it could be of your interest, because it is linked with User:KissmeKate. --Xabier Cid (talk) 20:47, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Stuart Milk content
How can I go about reversing the copyright removal decision? I'm an original author of the content in question and as such I also know that the other authors also intended this to be publicly used - as evidenced by the bios usage in numerous places. Varnent (talk) 03:35, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Re: Marriage amendments
Hi, would you mind responding to my comment on that talk page? Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 05:06, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Hey Hekerui, how are you? If you're not busy, this stub could use your help. I'm listening to the album right now, and it's worth the $16.52 that Amazon charges. It comes with a DVD which I haven't watched yet. Later, and take care, Drmies (talk) 18:07, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, thank you for he note! I'll take a look some time later. Best Hekerui (talk) 21:06, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
State amendments banning same-sex unions
As currently written, the article is very US oriented. In the US, same-sex unions is a common name to describe both marriages and other forms of legal binding couples agreements. Defense of marriage is a POV name adopted by religious groups to make it sound like they are defending marriage from attack rather then trying to prohibit same sex partnerships. If there is a better name that avoids the POV of the previous name and makes this clear from a worldwide prospective, then propose it. The policy is to "prefer non-judgmental language" and to "accurately indicate the relative prominence of opposing views" those points were clearly not supported by those seeking to keep the previous title. I suppose you could have made an argument that instead of same sex union we could have used same-sex marriage which might have been clearer, but that was not discussed as an option. Other options could have included 'civil unions', 'gay marriage' and 'domestic partnerships'. Vegaswikian (talk) 17:56, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
I updated the data of the article, and I'm planning to make brief articles. According to you, who are the artists that don't need your "notability guideline" template. --Opus88888 (talk) 21:20, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
DC
What does the trivial info you readded have to do with anything? CTJF83 09:40, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
- Why bring it up on the talk page, when we can discuss it amongst ourselves first? By your reasoning, Same-sex marriage in Iowa should say: "Iowa became the only jurisdiction in the United States west of the Mississippi River to allow same-sex couples to marry." And as far as "geographical distribution of SSM in the U.S.", Iowa is the only state not in the northeast that allows marriage. So if anything, there should be mention that Iowa, in the Midwest and away from the northeast has marriage. CTJF83 09:59, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks
I appreciate the pint! Ironically, I don't drink either, but I enjoyed it anyway! –CWenger (^ • @) 22:41, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
I mentioned you in my comment at the above link because you were the editor who added a blurry photo of Kim Guadagno back into her article. I have removed this photo in the past because it is of such poor quality. Maybe you can explain (in that discussion) why you think the photo should remain. Neutron (talk) 16:21, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
On the new pic: Very good! Thank you. Neutron (talk) 22:31, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Invite to WikiConference India 2011
| Hi Hekerui,
The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011. But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach. As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions. We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011 |
|---|
Assessments
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hey Hekerui, how are you? Do you know anything about ouds? And do you happen to know Turkish, by any chance? Your help is appreciated. Drmies (talk) 22:18, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Talk page note
Message added Ajnem (talk) 11:53, 15 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
can you please help me?
I would like your help. Can you ink a world map? I have a list of nations that Muammar Gaddafi has visited, and I can send you the list. It would look a little like the world map of Pope John Paul II's visits. I'll give you a barnstar for your hard work. Please contact me on my talk page and thank you so much!
Sincerely,
Screwball23 talk 06:16, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
...well, I guess you're not interested...--Screwball23 talk 19:48, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 19:30, 16 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Daniel Simanek (talk • contribs) 19:30, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Next election in Denmark listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Next election in Denmark. Since you had some involvement with the Next election in Denmark redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Bridgeplayer (talk) 01:04, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Executive Schedule
Just what is it about this term that makes you think it applies to the US government, rather than generically? Is this a US-centric campaign to assume that the US is the only country in the world? Tony (talk) 12:50, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Photo Attribution
Hey Hekerui! A while back you rejected a photo I'd uploaded due to attribution problems. Thing is, I'm pretty certain I've met all the criteria. I'd like to swap in a CC licensed photo that's more representative of Peter Thiel -- the current one is fuzzy and old: (The Thiel Foundation, http://thielfoundation.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=5&Itemid=10, {{CC BY-ND 3.0 | http://thielfoundation.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=5&Itemid=10}})
Is there anything else I can provide? Since the file was previously deleted, it's not allowing me to re-upload it.
Sincerely, User talk:Sandusky Sweeper
Implementation of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"
Thanks, Hekerui, for correcting the formatting of my reference for the full implementation of DADT (via repeal of the administrative discharge for "homosexual conduct") on 9/30/11. I am not a Wiki regular, and couldn't seem to get the citation form right myself. I was hoping that an interested and more competent contributor, such as yourself, would help me out, and you did. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.49.74.74 (talk)
French Senate election
If wikipedia's policies allow a false statement to be published simply because this is what a random unknowledgeable website says, then I'd say there's something wrong with wikipedia's policies. Meanwhile, I'm a French Poli Sci student (and a political nerd) and I have the arrogance to assume that for this kind of things what I say shouldn't be worth less than a random article. But, if you absolutely want a source, here is one : http://welections.wordpress.com/2011/09/26/french-senate-2011/
"Because of the Senate’s rural bias, the Senate has always been a “chamber of sober second thought”, and, by consequence, quite conservative. The Socialist left has never won a majority in the Senate."
"The brain-dead media usually says that “the Senate is right-wing since 1958″, assuming they don’t go sensational on us and say that it’s been right-wing since 1876. While a case could be made that, by modern definitions of left and right, the Senate has been more ‘right-wing’ for its history, it is not quite correct to say that the right has held the Senate."
Clear enough ?
Antonio V (talk) 16:45, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
- There is always a simple way to solve this : link to the wikipedia articles showing the Senate elections during the Fourth and Third republic. Or, if you prefer, link to the sources these wikipedia pages refer to. You'll acknowledge that the left, as defined today, has never held a majority in the Senate. This is an uncontestable fact, not a subjective point of view.
- I have nothing against medias in general or Reuters in particular, but for these kind of subjects they are utterly unreliable (as this case proves). So the question is, how is having a worthless source better than having no source at all ?
- Now, I won't lose my sleep if the wiki page keeps stating something false, but since I like wikipedia and I'm trying to make it better, I genuinely think that we shouldn't leave on a wiki page a sentence that is just not true. Do as you feel : as for me, I think I've done my job.
- Also, sorry if I sounded aggressive. That wasn't my purpose at all and I understand your point of view even though I don't share it.
Zachary Quinto
Really nice what you did with the Personal life part of his page. Smoothed things down really well. Thanks :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.155.216.5 (talk) 18:03, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Miklos Jancso Article Assessment
Thank you for reviewing the WikiProject Biography assessment for the Miklos Jancso article. I knew the article warranted an upgrade from Stub-class, but was not entirely sure if it met the criteria for C-class, so I erred on the side of caution in assessing the article as Start-class, a decision which was disputed by User:66.212.78.220.--TommyBoy (talk) 00:29, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
Your recent CSDs
I declined a few of them - you added an F9 tag - as the uploader has not claimed ownership, the F11 tag is more appropriate - F11 says "If an uploader has specified a license and has named a third party as the source/copyright holder without providing evidence that this third party has in fact agreed, the item may be deleted seven days after notification of the uploader" - which is what has occurred with those images - in fact several were already tagged with the F11 tag {{di-no permission}}. Ronhjones (Talk) 23:28, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
- These images aren't allowed to be changed, so changing them and uploading them under a false license is copyright violation. Hekerui (talk) 07:40, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
I removed what I think was all of the copyright violating language. If it's still untenable, send this matter to WP:AfD. Bearian (talk) 00:18, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
I don't see a direct copyvio. I will add a pod tag. Can you document it or send it to AfD? Bearian (talk) 00:38, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for the guidelines and for the welcome! Sakusei (talk) 18:27, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Epsilon Eridani FAC
Hello Hekerui,
Are you satisfied that I have addressed your concerns at the FAC for the Epsilon Eridani article? Thank you. Regards, RJH (talk) 16:13, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
reassessment of Same-sex marriage in the United States
Hi, please provide detail for this reassessment on the article's Talk page so that it may be improved, thanks. AV3000 (talk) 03:17, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
response
I got your message and I'm not sure what you mean. I took off the editorializing, and I left in the part about the Liberal Party's endorsement, which is actually a notable occurrence.--Screwball23 talk 17:20, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
Re: Full Circle
Thanks for your kind words and for your contributions to the article. I did have one question, which I posted on the article's talk page. I am not very familiar with Indian classical music (or Indian music in general), but I often use select articles to learn about a particular subject (A Meeting by the River for example). I look forward to completing the article, promoting to GA status and hopefully adding a quality contribution to WP India and WP in general. Feel free to keep an eye on the article and improve it as you see fit. --Another Believer (Talk) 01:12, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- Let me know if you have any other thoughts on Full Circle: Carnegie Hall 2000 (or feel free to post on the talk page). I will be nominating for GAN soon. --Another Believer (Talk) 16:12, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Actually, I posted a question on the article's talk page if you are able to help. If not, no worries! --Another Believer (Talk) 16:36, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks again for your help re: Full Circle: Carnegie Hall 2000--the article now has GA status! --Another Believer (Talk) 04:28, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
U.S. Senators Supporting same-sex marriage
Hi Hekerui. I see that you've previously edited File:US Senators Supporting SSM.svg when there are changes to be made. Sen. Menendez of New Jersey published an op-ed this morning announcing his support for same-sex marriage. While I've updated List of supporters of same-sex marriage in the United States, I'm unable to update the map since I lack an image-editing program. Are you able to do it? Many thanks. Lincolnite (talk) 03:24, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. Lincolnite (talk) 21:34, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Could you give your opinion? [1] Ron 1987 (talk) 22:19, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Category error
Please stop Category:Albums by artist is in no way redundant. Please stop http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category%3AShivkumar_Sharma_albums&action=historysubmit&diff=468169489&oldid=461125361 removing it] immediately. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:13, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Article creation
Hi Brother, Thanks for the input. I am very careful in creating new article, and start those that qualify to be on Wikipedia. This is a typical problem we face in creating India-related articles as the subjects are not documented, but for a few media coverage. So I create articles which I can find news sources for. These classical song related articles that I have been creating are very popular in concerts etc. Not having an article on Wikipedia for such popular songs is a big void. I have started, for example, Hangama Hai Kyon Barpa article, which at the time was a one line article, but now its of decent quality. There are numerous such examples in other areas. Please understand that here we face a unique problem of not finding sources for great many articles. That's been a major frustration with my contributions over the years. Cheers Randhir 03:11, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Quintana Roo
Would CNN México be a reliable source to site? I found an article it did about the Quintana Roo situation (http://mexico.cnn.com/nacional/2011/11/30/sin-hacer-una-reforma-legal-quintana-roo-realiza-sus-primeras-bodas-gay) titled "Sin hacer una refoma legal, Quintana Roo realiza sus primeras bodas gay" (Without legal reform, Quintana Roo has its first gay weddings). You can read it on Google Translate here (http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fmexico.cnn.com%2Fnacional%2F2011%2F11%2F30%2Fsin-hacer-una-reforma-legal-quintana-roo-realiza-sus-primeras-bodas-gay). Thanks, Xnux 06:07, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Quintana Roo
- Copying and pasting is perfectly acceptable. It happens all the time. See Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
- It is acceptable to create the article, because even if same-sex marriage isn't legal there, it can still chronicle what is going on. Examples: Same-sex marriage in Australia and Same-sex marriage in Scotland.
- No one owns the article, and all are welcome to edit it. In reality it needed its own article so the topic can organically grow.
I hope this helps, and I take no offense. Me-123567-Me (talk) 21:03, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
You are the one who asked to discuss this in one place. So let's keep it at Talk:Recognition of same-sex unions in Mexico#Quintana Roo. Me-123567-Me (talk) 21:27, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
I'm going to be nice and not template you, but please remember the three revert rule. Me-123567-Me (talk) 21:06, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Amanda Ireton
Just a friendly note that Amanda Ireton has been restored since its proposed deletion was contested via requests for undeletion. Feel free to bring to AfD. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 01:13, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
I reverted your changes. We don't always remove stuff just to discuss it. Sometimes the additions remain during discussions. I've viewed all of the sources for the article, and they all are reliable. I'd ask you not to remove it again without consensus. Me-123567-Me (talk) 19:11, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, I was referring to this article being added to Template:Same-sex unions. Me-123567-Me (talk) 19:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- I invite you to join me in a new discussion. --Me-123567-Me (talk) 19:51, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- There is another place to report 3RR violations, and you have to give a warning first as you have to show the diff of it being added. But be careful, if you're reporting and you've also violated, you'll also get blocked. Me-123567-Me (talk) 19:53, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation. |
Request for further info :D
Thanks for the replacement of the image on the VirtualBox wiki, but I am a little confised as to the reasoning. The image is of computer software that serves a purpose both impossible to demonstrate otherwise, and one which contains a specific license clause permitting screenshots for demonstrative purposes, I will try to find the relavent link.
In any case, thankyou for the well written note and for finding another suitable image :D
NotinREALITY 08:55, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Thankyou
thanks for the helpful explanation about the replacement image, it helped me to better understand this particular aspect of usable images :D
|
The Guidance Barnstar | |
| Awarded to Hekerui for excellent guidance toward a new user of Wikipedia |
NotinREALITY 21:07, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Biography Assessments
Thank you for your recent assistance with WikiProject Biography assessments. I have recently become one of the few Wikipedians to continue actively using the assessment requests, and I do the best I can with that, but any assistance from my fellow Wikiproject Biography users in assessing articles or reviewing my assessment decisions is greatly appreciated. --TommyBoy (talk) 23:23, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Denis Gifford Article Assessment
I wanted to let you know that I mentioned your recent recent re-assessment of the Denis Gifford article in a discussion I initiated on User:Bugsysiegel71's Talk page since he had submitted the most recent assessment request for the article. In my comments on his Talk page, I encouraged him to contact either me or you regarding any questions he may have regarding the article assessment. --TommyBoy (talk) 01:14, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Article about Person AV Anand
Hi Hekerui, I am trying to create an article about a well known Percussionist from south india. The person is one of the senior most Percussionist in the field of Indian music and has won many awards so far and has given musical concerts in US, Singapore, UK etc. This was deleted by drmies under A7 category on feb 05th 2012. Lated drmies has edited the article and placed it in the following link for me to work on. User:SrikanthOnWiki/A.V. Anand, . Drmies asked me to get in touch with you saying there is a DYK in the article and you will understand what it is. Could you help me in putting this article on wiki. The link in my workspace has all basic information to be the start point. if it is fine, please move it into wiki.
i am working on getting more references which i can add once it is moved also. I am new to adding/editing things on wiki. so need a little help.
thanks.
Looking forward to hear from you.
SrikanthOnWiki (talk) 09:28, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Thanks hekerui. I saw the edits that you have made and there is all basic information and i am ok with it.
I have included the link of awards that he has been by bangalore gayana samaja and its link. This would be a criteria for addition of artilcle i guess. I am looking for more references to add. please take a look into the edit i have made.
About the copy paste, i will make it a point to not to do the same next time. :). Sorry about that. Since this is my first article, i was not sure of few things.
I will check with drmies again. Thank you for your inputs.
SrikanthOnWiki (talk) 07:57, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Hekerui. Thanks for all your help in bringing the article to good shape.
SrikanthOnWiki (talk) 08:15, 18 February 2012 (UTC)