User talk:Hansh

Sale, Greater Manchester FAC[edit]

Hi. I'm sorry to bother you, but as a LoCE member, I just wondered if you would be willing to have a look through the Sale, Greater Manchester article. It is currently a Featured Article Candidate and needs a copy-edit for grammar by someone who hasn't yet seen it. Any other ways to improve the article would also be welcome. Thank you very much, if you can. Epbr123 07:39, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken a thorough look at the article, and apart from a few Britishisms, I could not find anything to complain about. Perhaps you need someone more experienced who knows what to look for. Good luck with the candidacy. --Hansh 12:56, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Epbr123 13:11, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

League of Copyeditors[edit]

I'm very sorry I haven't had a chance to welcome you earlier, I have been incredibly busy lately. We are glad to have your help. Currently, we have really cut down the backlog of articles in need of copyedit. Therefore, a major goal at this moment is to identify new articles that are in need of work. When you run across them, be sure to tag them for copyediting.

If you have any questions at all, do not hesitate to drop me a line.Trusilver 21:52, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tool (band) - FAC[edit]

Hi Hansh, sorry to bother you, but I was looking through the list of the copyeditors league and stumbled on your entry. Tool (band) needs someone with better capabilites than mine to proofread spelling and grammar (en-US). Any suggestions or hints regarding bad or clumsy prose in the article would be appreciated as well and could be added to its FAC. Thanks in advance and best wishes, Johnnyw talk 14:32, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

League of Copyeditors roll call[edit]

Greetings from the League of Copyeditors. Your name is listed on our members page, but we are unsure how many of the people listed there are still active contributors to the League's activities. If you are still interested in participating in the work of the League, please follow the instructions at the members page to add your name to the active members list. Once you have done that, you might want to familiarise yourself with the new requests system, which has replaced the old /proofreading subpage. As the old system is now deprecated, the main efforts of the League should be to clear the substantial backlog which still exists there.
The League's services are in as high demand as ever, as evinced by the increasing backlog on our requests pages, both old and new. While FA and GA reviewers regularly praise the League's contributions to reviewed articles, we remain perennially understaffed. Fulfilling requests to polish the prose of Wikipedia's highest-profile articles is a way that editors can make a very noticeable difference to the appearance of the encyclopedia. On behalf of the League, if you do consider yourself to have left, I hope you will consider rejoining; if you consider yourself inactive, I hope you will consider returning to respond to just one request per week, or as many as you can manage. Merry Christmas and happy editing, The League of Copyeditors.

Melon‑Bot (STOP!) 18:20, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Mistarille" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mistarille. Since you had some involvement with the Mistarille redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 17:06, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]