User talk:HParv Kumar

June 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm El cid, el campeador. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Chaulukya dynasty have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ^ᐁT₳LKᐃ 16:17, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

—SpacemanSpiff 17:03, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Solanki (clan), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 17:45, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Solanki (clan). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Alexf^(talk) 18:42, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For repeated addition of OR/POV to caste articles, including edit warring, I have decided, in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the terms of this community discussion, to impose the following sanction on you:

Topic banned from any edits and pages related to castes, social groups, gotras etc for a period of six months

This sanction has been logged at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction to the community at the administrators' noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me on my talk page, before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. —SpacemanSpiff 02:14, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for editing logged out to violate topic ban. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 06:27, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for repeatedly violating topic ban via IP. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 17:00, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeatedly violating topic ban by IP socking. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 07:59, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]