User talk:Graxe

Welcome![edit]

Hello Graxe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask me on my talk page or see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question. Again, welcome! --Sean|Bla ck 01:44, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oil Pastels[edit]

Thanks for noticing and saying thanks. It's a pretty good article btw Guinnog 22:10, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

translation[edit]

Hi, as requested, i tried to translate a part of it. Here is the first part, so i can't loose it.

After the end of the First World War the Japanese education reformer Kanae Jamamoto argued for a less restraining Japanese educational system, that was in his opinion far too much fixed on the uncritical absorbing by the student of the subject matter, especially through imitaion. He expressed his views in his book Theory of selfexpression whitch claimed for the Dzjijoe-ga-method, learning without a teacher.
The teachers Rinzo Satake and Sjoekoe Sasaki (brother in law of Rinzo) read the book and became fanatic supporters of the new doctrine. They proposed to Jamamoto to replace the lots of hours that Japanese children had to spend on imitating ideograms with indian ink partially by free draw-hours with an as much as possible non-watery medium. The use of pastel chalk was considered, but rejected because it wouldn't adhere to the quite slippery paper that was used for the writinglessons, and the schools had no money for two types of paper.
They decided that they had to develop a new form of the already known pastel chalk, whitch was in a inferior variant made in Japan. In 1921 the first tests were taken with succes, and the two men set up the Sakura Cray-pas Company for the mass production of the new drawmaterial. The young company directed itself immediately to the export, to get a start-up grant from the ministry of economical affairs; the ministry of education looked at the modernists in the conservative Japanese education with suspicion. Therefor Satake founded a free privateschool for children with rich parents. That was the reason that letting your children draw with colour became a symbol for a prosporous and liberal way of life.
However, soon became clear that drawing with pure crayola was not suitable; It was not usefull for the attaching of two layers, and the merging of colours was very hard. Therefor was decided to add oil to the product. The first oil pastels were produced from 1924 out of a merge of paraffine, stearine acid and coconut oil. The simple compilation, still without stabilisator, had as disadvantage that the sticks began to melt when it was warm, and became rock hard when it froze. Untill 1927 they produced seperate summer- and wintersticks, with an optimal mixture for the high (with less oil) and low temperatures. The product became an enormous succes, and was imitated by lots of companies in as well Asia as in the USA and Europe. Sakura is however still an important consortium. Every year are, as estimates by the company Prang, about five billion under about fifty different trade-marks.
Sakura let immediately produce paintings with the new medium to let the use of it find it's way in. Already in the 1930's the new material was used by avant-garde artists, (...)

If you like, you could take out errors etc, or not. :) The rest will come some other time, i hope tomorrow or next weekend. effeietsanders 23:44, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Graxe! I'll be glad to be of assistance. The easiest way is for me to directly insert the relevant information into the article. See if you like it — if not: throw it out again! Should any questions remain, don't hesitate to ask. Of course, I can't guarantee any coherent answers ;o). It's good to know people share an interest in such a gorgeous medium!

Greetings, --MWAK 10:05, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:Blended Oil pastel.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:46, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Oil pastel dog.jpg[edit]

The file File:Oil pastel dog.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned personal image of no discernible use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:03, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Texture (painting)[edit]

The article Texture (painting) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article "Texture (visual arts)" encompasses all information on this page. This article is thus redundant.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]