i have nthign against homosexuals and it matters very little to me wheterher or not Clay Aiken is a homosexual or not. my only problem with including that is that many people wante d to cite a source about a source, which seems kind of nunnecssary since the actual People article puported to be the direct source was coming out the very next day. i see nor eason to rush to add something like that to the Aien article using a source like CNN when a direct seconadary source like People magazine would be available in just one day. sorry if this somehow comes across as hating homosexuality, but it really has nothign to do with that; i want wikipedia to use the best source as often as possible (People magazine) rather than a good source that is not as good as the best source in all mattrers. i hope you will reconsider your illconsidered accasation and learn to treat other editors better Smith Jones (talk) 02:33, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dude CNN is A VALID SOURCEe. Get over it. I understand your conservative bias gets in the way of the facts, but please understand that before you make comments. Gcarini (talk) 06:43, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
what the hel are you on about now!? i am not a conservaitve, i have nothing against homosexuals and i dont care that Clay Aiken is a homseoxual. I just wanted to get the best source. i have NOT edited the article or done anything to remove the CNN source. All is did was SUGGEST THAT people magazine might be a good source ON THE TALK PAGE & the WP:ANI report. THATS IT. Maybe you should watch your own bias before toyou start flinging around accusations. thats it. Smith Jones (talk) 23:50, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I will push a complaint against you if you continue to post these abusive messages on my page. Your bias is incredibly evident. On this website we do not push conservative views, or liberal ones for that matter. This is a non-biased website. CNN, MSNBC, and the like are valid sources. Anymore abuse and I will be lodging a complaint against you. Gcarini (talk) 06:40, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I respectufly asking you to stop posting on ym talkpage at all. it isc lear that you have only desire to create controversy over a minor coment on an article page. Smith Jones (talk) 21:54, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not creating controversy. Go to conservativepedia if you don't like the way things are run here. Gcarini (talk) 00:07, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
