User talk:Galib x360

Muhammad images

Hello. I have reverted your changes to the Muhammad article. The lead image of the article is calligraphic because that is the most common representation of Muhammad, as determined by long-standing community-wide consensus. Please do not replace any images with different ones without first gaining consensus for your proposed change on Talk:Muhammad/images. Thanks. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:57, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

August 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Manhattan Project. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:03, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

@ Galib x360: You need to read farther than the infoboxes to find the referenced content that supports the assertions in the infobox, specifically the searches for relevant facilities and research in Germany and Italy, and especially Alsos Mission. Acroterion (talk) 15:09, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Manhattan Project, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 15:26, 25 August 2018 (UTC)