User talk:GIRC V2
May 2015[edit]
I don't know what your interest (your only interest so far) in editing Goldsmiths Students' Union is, but you cannot keep reinserting all that inflammatory material [citation needed] to the article without discussion. Your recourse is to go to article Talk page and propose the material and let others come to a WP:CONSENSUS as to what is appropriate.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:03, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- That’s because you state that it is inflammatory without explaining how it is, just because you state it is does not make it true. Where is your citation as to this being true? All of my edits are backed by citations. --GIRC V2 (talk) 10:01, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- The only inflammatory content was said and done by Miss Mustafa herself. If she doesn't want people to write that she abused her position, she shouldn't have done it in the first place. GIRC V2 has all the sources and nothing he has put has been overexaggerated, deliberately misinterpreted or anything like that. '''tAD''' (talk) 10:12, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
things you ought to know about[edit]
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Bosstopher (talk) 00:19, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Blocked[edit]
You seem to be here solely in order to promote an agenda which is orthogonal to Wikipedia's purpose and values, and you have repeatedly violated our policy on writing about living people. I'm afraid you're not helping. I've blocked this account for now. Guy (Help!) 15:51, 25 May 2015 (UTC)