User talk:Fuppimuppi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Kroppsskydd 12 moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Kroppsskydd 12. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Annh07 (talk) 16:47, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, i completely understand why you came to this decision.
I'll take my time to try and make the article as informational as possible with the most reliable references i can source. Fuppimuppi (talk) 16:59, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Selfstudier (talk) 15:52, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know, what article did i edit for you to make this prompt? Fuppimuppi (talk) 16:00, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Fuppimuppi. Thank you for your work on 209th Artillery Brigade (Israel). SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of birds of Denmark[edit]

Hi Fuppimuppi and welcome to Wikipedia. I saw your work at List of birds of Denmark and it looks good. I did want to point out that the Danish names added here and here should not be capitalized unless they would normally be capitalized mid-sentence in Danish. The names in the native language really help the article, but I wanted to point out the capitalization standard. I was also confused by "Those without tags are tagged as historical" and I'm not sure what you meant, so you may want to review that. Keep up the good work. SchreiberBike | ⌨  01:22, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @SchreiberBike: thank you for pointing out the error i made, i'm not actually danish nor do i speak danish, i just copy-pasted the names straight from Danish Wikipedia since i couldn't find a Danish iNaturalist website which i tend to use when adding names in other languages to lists akin to this one.
When it comes to the meaning behind "Those without tags are tagged as historical" i'm not actually sure either, it was there before i made my edits and i just assumed it made sense in some way, so i just changed the name of the tag to the new tag i added. Thank you again. Fuppimuppi (talk) 05:56, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]