User talk:Frozen Jese
Welcome to my talk page.
Welcome[edit]
|
May 2017[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Fixing a Hole, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. freshacconci (✉) 14:10, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Sundayclose, you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 22:34, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Survey Invite[edit]
I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they effect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.
I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.
Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 21:31, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Random personnel changes[edit]
Do you have a reliable source for any of these changes you are making in the "Personnel" sections of articles? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:27, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
August 2017[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at All Together Now. Sundayclose (talk) 23:50, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
September 2017[edit]
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Mrs. Robinson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sundayclose (talk) 03:01, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
I'm sorry? That was not vandalism and you know it. If you want the long and short of it, I was adding material I had read up some time ago but couldn't find the source (in case you were wondering, yes, some people still read books!) I know I was being a bit hasty with my addition, but that's no warrant for a block. --Frozen Jese (talk) 20:37, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- After you ignore numerous warnings for adding unsourced material, yes it is vandalism. That's why there is no level five warning template for unsourced edits: the vandalism warning is used. If you think you can't be blocked for making unsourced edits after the string of warnings you have received, you are in for a rude awakening. You may find this hard to believe, but there actually is a policy against making unsourced edits, especially after warnings. But regardless of what you call it, repeatedly adding unsourced material after many warnings is every much a blockable offense as is vandalism. You are skating on thin ice. Next time there won't be a warning of any kind; I go straight to WP:AIV. Then we'll see how far your "It's not vandalism" argument will get you. Sundayclose (talk) 01:53, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Frozen Jese. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Frozen Jese. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |