User talk:Frochi

Warning[edit]

PLEASE follow the WP:NPOV and WP:RS rules regarding the William Buckley article. You MUST have reliable sources for material you add. You cannot remove fully sourced material because it displeases you. and please look at the WP:3R rule which limits edit wars. Rjensen (talk) 18:02, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Rjensen, do not lecture me on rules which you apparently fail to comprehend. I use primary sources when writing an encyclopedic article on a historical event as per Wikipedia guidelines, while you liberally use secondary sources to distort the position of one who displeases you. Take a look at the WP:3R rules and get back to me.
--Frochi (talk) 20:19, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

the rules are clear: "Articles should rely on secondary sources whenever possible. For example, a review article, monograph, or textbook is better than a primary research paper. When relying on primary sources, extreme caution is advised: Wikipedians should never interpret the content of primary sources for themselves. See Wikipedia:No original research." Rjensen (talk) 21:22, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]