User talk:Folly Mox/Archive 2
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Three years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:53, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Green for hope
 | |
| Lenten Rose |
Today, we have a DYK about Wilhelm Knabe, who stood up for future with the striking school children when he was in his 90s, - a model, - see here. - Thank you for your poetic position in the arb case request, - I feel I have to stay away, but there are conversations further down on the page, in case of interest, - in a nutshell: "... will not improve kindness, nor any article". - Yesterday, I made sure on a hike that the flowers are actually blooming ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:33, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Arbitration Case Opened
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/RexxS. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/RexxS/Evidence. Please add your evidence by March 13, 2021, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/RexxS/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, SQLQuery me! 04:51, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you
Your comments were very sweet towards me on my Guestbook. Thank you for seeing me. I am so grateful for the opportunity to be here and collaborate with some amazing people on a daily basis. My interactions here, even those less than ideal, are precious to me as a learning and life experience. --ARoseWolf 14:00, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Deaths of Christianne and Robert Shepherd
I notice your removal of my tag from 2017. I have now given an explanation at the talk page-- I had omitted one on grounds of it being obvious. This page is a violation of the rules against attack pages, and I am considering listing it for speedy deletion as such, but in view of the likely opposition to the removal of tabloid-style articles, I might decide to go directly to afd. . You might want to see if some editing would help, such as removing the pathetic adjectives, the tone of advocacy, the detail of events, and especially the detailed account of each of the company's statements in favor of a summary. An article about 1/3 the length would seem to have some chance of being encyclopedic. DGG ( talk ) 05:07, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
FYI
This was a WMF-banned editor, meaning all their edits can be reverted without explanation. Thanks, --Ferien (talk) 09:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Since you commented before on the most recent discussion, any further input would be appreciated. I believe the discussion may be venturing into un- (or even counter-) productive territory. I’ve tried to impress that atheist and agnostic views on the Bible do indeed belong in the article, and are welcome, as we are not in the business of quashing viewpoints. But a scholarly approach conforming to WP standards (and style standards, such as in the lead) is necessary. Instead it seems to be devolving into a mud-slinging discussion fueled by anger or at least misunderstanding. That’s my take, anyway, and I’d welcome honest feedback on a better approach from me and/or a way forward. Thank you. Jtrevor99 (talk) 18:41, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
 |
The memory of SlimVirgin is pictured again today, in the context of my dangerous thoughts about arbcom. I mentioned you here. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:08, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Help improvements. Thanks you. Mdnys (talk) 06:14, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, sockpuppet of User:Haiyenslna. I took a walk outside instead. It smells so fresh in the January air! May you enjoy as well 💚 Folly Mox (talk) 06:29, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- The air is very fresh. It's my favorite time of the year because of that. I love my yoga sessions overlooking the lake. Thank you for your kind words. All I know is how to be me. It's difficult here at times because this isn't a social media site nor is it a forum. I get that and I try to abide by that as much as possible by focusing on content and content related issues. But I don't believe that was solely the spirit of this projects intent. We are social creatures. We get into these communities of people in order to find a way to coalesce together to accomplish goals. In doing so we naturally form relationships. I call our lives a Song. I believe our Songs call out to others and are answered by other Song's moving at a compatible speed to our own, vibrations if you will. I wouldn't even call it a theory, its just my interpretation for what I see and hear around me. I am so glad you mentioned the human touch because when we physically touch someone it is the fullness of who we are coming into contact with the fullness of another. Likewise when I "touch" someone with my words I am putting the full force of all that I am behind every letter, every syllable, and I know it has purpose. I wholeheartedly believe in the kindness and goodness of the human Spirit and Song and I try to let that radiate off me in every encounter and every instance. Thank you so much for saying what you did on Timwi's user talk page. I trust in your words to offer him encouragement and help him see that he still has a place here when he is ready to take that step. If I show kindness it is simply a reflection of the kindness of others like yourself. I am like the moon which reflects the light of the sun. --ARoseWolf 14:35, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Arbitration case opened
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct_in_deletion-related_editing. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct_in_deletion-related_editing/Evidence. Please add your evidence by July 9, 2022, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct_in_deletion-related_editing/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 11:20, 18 June 2022 (UTC)