User talk:Fiet Nam

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 1997, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kariteh 11:37, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template move[edit]

In Wikipedia:Requested moves I found and obeyed a request "*Template:Fiet Nam's user talk page → User talk:Fiet Nam — there's no reason that this should be a template. —Zetawoof_(ζ) 21:09, 5 September 2007 (UTC)", so I moved the template call in page User:Fiet Nam accordingly. Anthony Appleyard 21:28, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Riksmål and Dano-Norwegian[edit]

Please stop reverting my edit to the Riksmål and Dano-Norwegian articles without giving a reason. I have redirected them to the Bokmål article after having incorporated the texts in that article. Thus everything is covered there. If you feel there is a problem with this, please tell what the problem is.

Please see the Wikipedia rules for dispute resolution. In particular, note that repeated reverts are forbidden and that discussion is compulsory when disputes arise. Plutix 09:09, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Dance. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please also stop making nonsense edits to Flag of Norway. Valentinian ^{T / C} 09:59, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Norwegian language[edit]

Please make sure your edits are factually correct. Inge 19:43, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Somali, Romansh etc.?[edit]

Why do you keep listing ISO codes for Somali, Romansh and other languages under Italian language? That article is about Italian language, not about languages spoken in Italy, by Italian citizens, in former Italian colonies and so on. They are mostly covered in List of languages of Italy. Thanks, Goochelaar 10:55, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tabán[edit]

Hi. Thanks for offering a translation of the Hungarian text on this page. However, I don't understand even the English translation. Do you speak Hungarian yourself? Let's work on this together to make it a good translation. Thanks. Cbdorsett 14:42, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Norwegian alphabet[edit]

Please stop making edits claiming that Norwegian doesn't contain the letter Y. Last time I checked, both "By" and "Øy" were common Norwegian words. "Fylke" also jumps to mind. Valentinian ^{T / C} 20:39, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Plutix 07:25, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And stop editing messages written by others! I've undone your edits to my message above. Valentinian ^{T / C} 09:17, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pages needing translation[edit]

Hi. I appreciate your efforts to help out with pages needing translation, but it's probably best to avoid using a machine translator in future. Some of the material you translated came out as gibberish in English. It's always better to leave these pages in the original until a human translator can make an attempt at rendering them accurately in English (or decide they fail Wikipedia policies and should be deleted). All the best. --Folantin 08:26, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 1 hour from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Angus McLellan (Talk) 09:44, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Latin Asia[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Latin Asia, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.photonicsknowledge.com/search/Latin_Asia. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 20:46, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stub template on user page[edit]

Hi Fiet Nam. I hope you don't mind that I subst'ed the stub template on your user page and removed the category link; I did this so that your page doesn't turn up in a category of articles for editors to expand.

--NeilN 11:30, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page deletion[edit]

Maybe you don't want a talk page but you're getting one anyways. This is essential for other editors to contact you. Pascal.Tesson 20:08, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is your agenda?[edit]

Why do you repeatedly try to squeeze an "Alemannic alphabet" into Alemannic German [1]? And why do you list these links on you userpage?

-- Matthead ^discuß! O 07:18, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Erm, just a bit confused by your edits to German language. I assume placing the links at the top of page was a simple error. But the additions to the country codes were a little odd - Norwegian is not a dialect of Modern High German - it's a distant cousin at most. And Finnish and Estonian - well, they're pretty much as unrelated as you can get from German whilst staying on the same continent! (see Finno-Ugric). Anyway, take a look at my edits there, and get in touch if you have queries. Knepflerle 12:48, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit[edit]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Differences between Norwegian Bokmål and Standard Danish page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Inge 09:05, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:에멜무지로[edit]

Hi, why did you move User:에멜무지로 to User:Emelmujiro? I'm moving it back. --Kjoonlee 20:05, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Piriodik tebel (standad)[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Piriodik tebel (standad), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Piriodik tebel (standad) is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Piriodik tebel (standad), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 13:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Pork, you will be blocked from editing. -- Arthur (talk) 20:30, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Religious restrictions on the consumption of pork, you will be blocked from editing. -- Arthur (talk) 20:31, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Tonga language (Thailand)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Tonga language (Thailand) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Collectonian (talk) 05:12, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Tonga language (Mozambique)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Tonga language (Mozambique) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Collectonian (talk) 05:13, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

I see that you are trying to contribute positively to wikipedia. However some of your edits are not helpfull, such as adding articles not written in english. I would urge you to use the sandbox for experiments and read thoroughly throught the guidelines and manuals of style to learn more on how a good wikipedia article should be created. Don't hesitate to ask for help or advice from fellow editors. Inge (talk) 09:36, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I want to strengthen this to a strong warning. Any more nonsense and you will be looking at a long or indef block. At the moment this situation is that your are creating more harm than good. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 20:09, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion about your edits here --Rodhullandemu (please reply here - contribs) 17:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keilor Downs Primary School[edit]

A tag has been placed on Keilor Downs Primary School, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb-Me^MyEars_MyMouth-timed 09:04, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fiet Nam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I won't vandalise Wikipedia ever again.

Decline reason:

You've had enough chances. It's clear that you aren't here to contribute constructively.— John Reaves 07:06, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

FYI, nice try, but that's not how it works... you can't unblock yourself. :P Please allow an administrator to review your request if you are serious about it. Thank you. --Kinu ^t/_c 07:00, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Fiet Nam for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. —An gr ^{If you've written a quality article...} 06:31, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:K-pt[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:K-pt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{tranclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:10, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Valtion tiedot[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:Valtion tiedot requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:39, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Infobox Water[edit]

Template:Infobox Water has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Jesse Viviano (talk) 20:42, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Northern Sami Wikipedia[edit]

The article Northern Sami Wikipedia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable version of Wikipedia: the article either includes only non-independent and self-published sources (especially Wikipedia itself), or has no sources at all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. eh bien mon prince (talk) 00:34, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]