User talk:Fairness and Truth

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Fairness and Truth, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 02:06, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

September 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Victor Vancier has been reverted.
Your edit here to Victor Vancier was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/, http://www.youtube.com/, http://www.youtube.com/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:06, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Victor Vancier[edit]

To avoid an full blown edit war, I have requested other people to have a look at the article. I did that here at Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard#Victor Vancier, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Jewish history#Request: Victor Vancier and at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography#Request: Victor Vancier. Feel free to ask more people to have a look at the article. The Banner talk 18:51, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I[edit]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Little green rosetta (talkcontribs)

Victor Vancier[edit]

WP:SOFIXIT. If you don't like the content of the article, change it, citing reliable sources. If someone reverts it, discuss it at the article talk page. Remember tho, the sources will rule that discussion. We refer to Muhammad Ali, Malcolm X, and Farrakhan by those names because that is what the world refers to them as. If you don't like the title of the article, find numerous reliable sources like respected newspapers that refer to him by your preferred name and make an argument for a page move (That is the procedure for changing an article's name). But remember that any argument you make must be based on reliable sources. What the subject of the article wants does not matter in the slightest. It is what the world calls him that is important. And I am sorry, but referring to a person that has been convicted of a terrorist attack as a terrorist is not a point you want to argue. Being convicted of a terrorist attack makes one a terrorist. Is there another definition? I can't see why you think posting a huge wall of unreferenced text in dozens of places will do anything to advance your cause. Just fix it! Gtwfan52 (talk) 19:48, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]