User talk:Elkman/Archive3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikistress[edit]

I sense a little wikistress. Just take a breather and things will work out. -Ravedave 03:37, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CHILL OUT your help is needed at Minnesota so please don't get blocked. -Ravedave 04:46, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I strongly agree. You've been doing a good job, so keep it up. - Ouzo 21:40, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why the insanity?[edit]

Lately you've been going about places insulting yourself claiming you are an unproductive editor - there is no reason for doing this. I would suggest that you take a Wikibreak and put behind whatever is stressing you at the moment, because at the moment your comments serve no purpose but to make you feel worse. Going about saying how awful of an editor you are won't make things better - you were a fine editor up until you decided to go about and say you weren't. We are here to build an encyclopedia, as if editors are stressed, then they should take a break so they can continue improving it in the future. So, my suggestion is that you take a step away from it all and get a good night's rest instead of worrying about a bunch of 0's and 1's going across your computer screen. And have a cookie. Cowman109Talk 00:24, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

?[edit]

Why do you keep implying that creating Minnesota State Highway 33 was a bad thing? The article is a very good start. The problem has nothing to do with the article or that it exists. But rather that User:SPUI has taken his naming crusade and bad attitude to that page as he has so many others before and is now edit warring on it. None of this has anything to do with your initial article which is a good start. JohnnyBGood t c VIVA! 00:41, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Message of thanks and support[edit]

You sound very upset, and rightly so, on SPUI's page. I just want to say thanks for all of your edits. Please don't feel that your contributions go unnoticed. --Tony Sidaway 00:55, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I second this message. --Dual Freq 01:11, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]