User talk:Editing84/Archive 1

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Welcome!

Hi Editing84! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 14:43, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks very much! Editing84 (talk) 14:50, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Infamous PR moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Infamous PR. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 07:38, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi, thanks and apologies! When you say it has no sources I assume you mean the sources used are not good enough? So- no to Billboard, no to Variety, no to Sounddazed, no to Mixmag etc? I was under the impression those were appropriate sources for music industry content, so I want to be sure what the main issue is here- the use of those sources, or the way the article is written? Thanks again Editing84 (talk) 17:29, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello! I think that the way the article is written is the main issue here. It is quite promotional. The sources are a more minor issue - try and find better ones if there are any. ¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 19:25, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Got it, thank you. I have removed some of the content and re-written some, as well as adding a couple of other sources, so it reads as more neutral now. I have now removed the advert tag to reflect this. Editing84 (talk) 23:35, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Infamous PR for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Infamous PR is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infamous PR until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SmartSE (talk) 00:10, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Conflict of interest

I do not see that anyone has asked this previously, but what is your connection with Infamous PR? Your edits give the impression that you may have a conflict of interest in regards to the page. Please read WP:COI and WP:PAID and make the appropriate disclosure if applicable. CNMall41 (talk) 20:47, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

No direct connection really, but I used to work connected to the dance music industry where they are based so I knew of them as a company- I've not been editing Wikipedia that long and wanted more practice creating pages on topics I know about. Thought they would be a good option as a small company, but obviously maybe a bit too small to have the notability required? Sorry if that was a COI. Editing84 (talk) 22:59, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Infamous PR (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Infamous PR and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 00:03, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Editing84! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! BuySomeApples (talk) 00:03, 14 January 2024 (UTC)