User talk:DonkeyW

Standing charge moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Standing charge, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:40, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 12:05, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've already appealed my block to arbcom[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DonkeyW (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is my legitamate account. Blooxo was blocked years ago.

Decline reason:

Blocks apply to the person, not just the account. Until your original account is unblocked, you (you personally) are not welcome here. If you have appealed your block to arbcom, it is additionally inappropriate to make an unblock request here. Yamla (talk) 12:11, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Additionally, this account is Confirmed to Blooxo. --Yamla (talk) 12:13, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blooxo isn't even my original account. I'm trying to reform. At least remove the sock puppetry tags and let me use DonkeyW as my main username when my unban is successful. All I did was create a stub on an article about the biggest energy crisis in Europe and that was bad enough to get banned again. Wikipedia's banning policy is too strict. I have 20 years of Wikipedia experience.

And Yamla reverted to a vandalized version of the Prestbury, Gloucestershire article in trying to revert me. DonkeyW (talk) 12:20, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Which other accounts have you used? Girth Summit _(blether) 12:24, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've created hundreds over the years. I just made the mistake of logging into an old account (Blooxo hasn't edited since 2009) which flagged check user. DonkeyW was my good faith attempt to edit constructively again. DonkeyW (talk) 12:29, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arbcom will make their own decision in due course. If you are not prepared to list the accounts you have edited under, I am not prepared to consider unblocking. I will say that if you are unblocked, you need to avoid making personal attacks on other editors. Accusing another editor of vandalism because you disagree with their judgment in deciding to draftify a new article is considered a personal attack, and is not acceptable. Girth Summit _(blether) 12:37, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]