User talk:Disavian/Archive 10

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 15

Wikipedia Signpost, February 8, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 5, Issue 6 8 February 2009 About the Signpost

News and notes: Elections, licensing update, and more Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's future, WikiDashboard, and "wiki-snobs" 
Dispatches: April Fools 2009 mainpage WikiProject Report: WikiProject Music 
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 21:47, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — February 16, 2009

The Signpost
Volume 5, Issue 7
Weekly Delivery
2009-02-16

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist.
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 06:33, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:

The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 01:25, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:16, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

The article Legal status of cartoon pornography depicting minors you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Legal status of cartoon pornography depicting minors for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. --Admiral Norton (talk) 21:53, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


Wikipedia Signpost — 16 March 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost  — 16 March 2009

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:31, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 23 March 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 03:55, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 30 March 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:56, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 April 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:56, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 13 April 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 16:10, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Georgia Tech Cable Network

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Georgia Tech Cable Network, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Per WP:NOT#DIR and we are not a TV Guide.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. NeutralHomerTalk • April 16, 2009 @ 02:38 02:38, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Georgia Tech Cable Network

First off, please do not remove PROD tags. Let the PROD procedure run its course and let the admins have their say first. Second, a university cable company is not that notable. Several universities have them and Georgia Tech is the only one with a page dedicated to it....but it isn't notable. Verizon FiOS or Comcast, those are notable cable companies, this isn't. - NeutralHomerTalk • April 16, 2009 @ 05:53

Perhaps you are confusing PROD with AFD? I've been here long enough to know that the notice you put on my talk page means what it says - any user can remove the tag for really any reason. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 06:27, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
No, not really. That would be an edit war. I have also been here long enough to know the rules. I can nom the page for AFD if you like....I would rather the admins have a look, but if you want it to go straight to AFD, that is fine with me. - NeutralHomerTalk • April 16, 2009 @ 06:29
PROD isn't about having an admin look at it, it's just a low-pressure method of suggesting deletion. There really is no other way of interpreting "You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason." From WP:PROD: "Proposed deletion is the way to suggest that an article is uncontroversially a deletion candidate, but that it does not meet the more stringent criteria for speedy deletion. If a PROD tag is added to an article, the article will be deleted about 5 days later if nobody objects. If any user objects—usually by removing the tag—then the article may be taken to Articles for Deletion for further discussion." —Disavian (talk/contribs) 06:34, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Well, you wanted it nom'd for deletion (AFD), I nominated it. It will surely get deleted now. There was a chance that it might get saved with the PROD tag on there. - NeutralHomerTalk • April 16, 2009 @ 06:37

AfD nomination of Georgia Tech Cable Network

I have nominated Georgia Tech Cable Network, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia Tech Cable Network. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. NeutralHomerTalk • April 16, 2009 @ 06:32 06:32, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 20 April 2009

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:23, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 April 2009

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:08, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

References

Sorry, I did not know about archive.org, I just went to the reference and it said it wasn't found. Anyway, it seems like you messed up the references with your edit. The reference for fight songs, takes you to the page about the controversy. The reference for the controversy that you re-added is still the "dead" one. Brinkley32 (talk) 01:55, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Jeremy Farris.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jeremy Farris.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Jwilkinsen Jr (talk) 15:04, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:GeorgiaTechPRImage

Template:GeorgiaTechPRImage has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jwilkinsen Jr (talk) 15:14, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 11 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 21:43, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:DealsPlus Homepage.png)

Thanks for uploading File:DealsPlus Homepage.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:56, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 18 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:45, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 25 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:27, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 1 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:17, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 15 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 11:20, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 22 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 29 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 01:45, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 July 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:29, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Clean, Old-Fashioned Hate.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Clean, Old-Fashioned Hate.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. CIreland (talk) 12:44, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

members list templates

I got tired of trying to keep all of these straight. see {{mem}}. These fix some alignment issues. --—— Gadget850 (Ed) talk - 19:55, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

momocon article

I got some notice that it's too much like an advertisement. What do I need to do to change it? ~Jess~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.176.156.44 (talk) 14:49, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Not really sure. They probably want more refs, and instead of a list of years, distinct paragraphs describing the event's history, etc. Sadly, I don't know of any really good convention articles to use as a model here. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 17:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
I looked around, but didn't find anything that was really amazing. E3, Game Developers Conference, San Diego Comic-Con International are all okay articles, and Dragon Con isn't bad, but none of them illustrate how to really write a convention article. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 17:13, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Table Sorting...

Hey, you did some work on Template:AlumniStart back in the day... I'm wondering why nothing's sorting now. Can we fix it? Thanks. - Jameson L. Tai talkguestbookcontribs 06:01, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Is there a defined way that lists/tables are supposed to be organized? In articles such as College of Management (GT), the table doesn't appear to have any organization or a sort button. Aside from tables with the sort options, I am not sure whether a list of notable alumni would be better sorted alphabetically (to easily find a known person), or chronologically by graduation (to track "accomplishment"/changes over time). (If you can't tell, I'm at a sub-novice wikipeida competence right now)Cdbkey1 (talk) 18:07, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

It boils down to who wrote the template. I haven't particularly bothered with the alumni lists on the college pages, instead preferring to focus on List of Georgia Institute of Technology alumni and List of Georgia Institute of Technology athletes, which (when I wrote them) were sortable. I don't know what's changed since then, but I will one day make them sortable again :) I generally prefer to sort by the person's last name when I write them. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 18:16, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
I added a "sortable" parameter to the template, but it's not enabled by default. I need to decide whether to enable it by default or manually add it to each section of each list. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 18:22, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Georgia Institute of Technology GA Sweeps: On Hold

I have reviewed Georgia Institute of Technology for GA Sweeps to determine if it still qualifies as a Good Article. In reviewing the article I have found several issues, which I have detailed here. Since you are a main contributor of the article (determined based on this tool), I figured you would be interested in contributing to further improve the article. Please comment there to help the article maintain its GA status. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 20:30, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Georgia Institute of Technology Featured Article Nomination

User:Lamenta3 and I have nominated Georgia Institute of Technology for Featured Article status. Please improve the article and contribute to the discussion. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 16:03, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Help with tables

I made a new table to be used on List of American football stadiums by capacity. I copied the code for Template:StadiumimgStart from a another table which was based on Template:AlumniStart, which I noticed you have edited. I was wondering how to use the parameters Option1 and Option2 to add new columns, so I can use this template on another article. Thank you in advance. --Pgp688 (talk) 00:15, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Look at how I've added Position to List of Georgia Institute of Technology athletes#American football. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 01:30, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank you very much! --Pgp688 (talk) 01:34, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 July 2009

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 08:48, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

When you submit this article for FAC, drop me a note. I'd like to do what I can to see that it gets promoted. In the meantime, I've added a handful of tags to the article in spots where things weren't clear. JKBrooks85 (talk) 04:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

GT FAC

  • Comments have been added. This is a courtesy message in case watchlists break. :) JKBrooks85 (talk) 10:49, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

YouTube GAN

Please see my comments at Talk:YouTube/GA2. Thanks! Jclemens (talk) 16:49, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Alumni Sorting

The (relatively) new template {{alum/start}} didn't have a sortable parameter. And I think that some parserfunctions may have changed as well. The question is, do we want to enable sorting by default? I designed the original template, and that's how I had it, and I doubt anyone is going to object to that feature. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 18:25, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure I was for auto-sorting when I asked about it a few months back. It'd be nice to have. - Jameson L. Tai talkguestbookcontribs 07:28, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
I went ahead and added it. Have a look at a relevant list... for example List of Georgia Institute of Technology alumni. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 09:21, 1 August 2009 (UTC)