User talk:Depaultivo

Blocking[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Depaultivo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked by User:AGK for being a sock puppet of User:Aimar120. This is not the case. AGK stated that it was confirmed that I was his sock puppet. If one was to the look at the evidence of my sock puppetry case (Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Aimar120), it would be found that there is no conclusive evidence supporting the claim by AGK. AGK is abusing his administrative powers. If he saw it necessary to block me, he should have done a 80 hour block (as suggested by Freewayguy in the sock puppet case), not indefinately. Furthermore, I sent AGK an email disputing my blocking, but I have not yet received a reply. AGK's decision to block me was wrong and as such, I ask another administrator to look at my sock puppetry case and determine a correct plan of action.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Depaultivo (talk • contribs) 13:10, 18 April 2008

Decline reason:

The sockpuppetry has been confirmed by a checkuser at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Aimar120. — Sandstein (talk) 18:27, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

End of Blocking[edit]

Can someone please give me a date as to when my blocking will be lifted?

It's an indefinite block, so it doesn't end. Anyways, during the sock case Aimar120 sent me a mail saying that you had a previous main account, and it didn't get blocked because it wasn't involved on vandalism, so you can use that one.

You can also create a new account, and probably not get blocked as soon as you don't repeat the same behaviour from before. If you repeat the vandalisms, however, it will just get labelled as another sock and blocked too --Enric Naval (talk) 07:17, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. But AGK better not block that account too. --Depaultivo (talk) 13:57, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]