User talk:Deepall66

January 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Thesara Jayawardane, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. if you need to add anything to this page, please discuss in the talk page, and edit in good faith. Landy3 (talk) 08:01, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Thesara Jayawardane. Rover10 (talk) 08:19, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

recently edit on wiki article Thesara Jayawardane - Welcome to WIKI. I believe you are new and still catching up things in WIKI. Please edit with good faith, its not nice to change BLP article without correct reference. Please understand specially when someone keep cleaning up the things. Landy3 (talk) 20:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This reference is enough good faith--Deepall66 (talk) 16:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. seicer | talk | contribs 01:25, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Deepall66 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

password of my previous account Deepal66's is lost. It is not active any more. please unblock Deepall66 (talk) 17:45, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'd find that believable if you hadn't edited from that account on January 23, five days after creating this one. Kinu ^t/_c 18:03, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Deepall66 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

At the moment password is not sensitive. It is not active any more. you can permanently block me if it is active Deepall66 (talk) 18:15, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We already have. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 19:58, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.