User talk:Dclemens1971

Query about Michael Breen page

I don't understand why you're suggesting the page for deletion. Breen is the CEO of a nonprofit and previously headed a think tank, both of which have their own Wiki entries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Purplewriter (talk • contribs) 14:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Please review the criteria for notability under WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Notability is not inherited by virtue of the organization someone is affiliated with but must be independently established by reliable secondary sources. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:45, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

I reviewed it, and disagree with you -- it is notable when someone, for example, is invited to testify at a congressional hearing and when someone is listed by secondary sources as an expert in his field -- but will try to find a couple more secondary sources. Purplewriter (talk) 17:29, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi. Who are you? I see you added William Jenkins to the ACNA Bishops list. I’m just wondering who put his name there. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KDJ3517 (talk • contribs) 21:44, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Dclemens1971

Thank you for creating St. John's Parish (Quincy, Illinois).

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:02, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Dclemens1971. Thank you for creating Church of the Holy Communion (Dallas). User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for contributing to the project!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 23:33, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Dclemens1971. Thank you for your work on Anglican Network in Europe. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:38, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Dclemens1971. Thank you for your work on Richard Lipka. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:11, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for correcting my reversions; didn't see you maintained the correct text on the front end. ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:18, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

No worries! Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:24, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Dclemens1971. Thank you for your work on Bishop Seabury Anglican Church. User:Reading Beans, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Reading Beans}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Reading Beans (talk) 05:35, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Dclemens1971. Thank you for your work on Parish Church of St. Helena. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating this article! Hopefully you will keep creating more!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:16, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Dclemens1971. Thank you for your work on Ted Follows (bishop). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article! Hopefully you can write more. Good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:23, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Joni Eareckson Tada

Re: your putting Joni in Category:American Reformed Episcopalians - I'm wondering whether you have evidence that she has belonged to that denomination in recent decades? It would hardly be fair to put her there just because she was brought up and confirmed there, and later expressed apprecation of the pastor who had served her church back then. I think that for some years she was at Grace Community Church, but by 2013 she was a "former member" - see Strange Fire Conference: Joni Eareckson Tada - but was evidently still on good terms with Grace's pastor John MacArthur. In fact in 2006 she had written that she was "a PCA (Presbyterian Church in America) church member now" - see Turning Evil on Its Head, and by 2017 she had been at a PCA congregation for "more than two decades" - see More than inspirational. In the light of this I will reverse your edit unless I hear back from you in the next couple of days. PeterR2 (talk) 19:33, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Anglican Church of the Good Samaritan is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 03:37, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Foley Beach

What is your basis for deleting his speaking engagement from November 2020 and corresponding archive.org link with his biography and other featured speakers? Loose canon (talk) 02:15, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

It lacks context for why it is relevant or significant. For all articles, and BLPs especially, information must not only be sourced; it must have context for why it is included. See WP:CHERRY. Please discuss on Talk:Foley Beach, not here.

I also suggest you familiarize yourself with WP:BLPCOI. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:20, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Dclemens1971. Thank you for your work on St. Paul's Cathedral (Valparaíso). User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 03:20, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Chapel

I didn’t add this drawing because I’m not sure the licensing is correct since it’s an artist rendering with no credit given. Do you think it’s free to use? APK whisper in my ear 22:00, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Since it's been uploaded to Commons, I default to "yes," unless a user wants to challenge the validity of the license. The uploader is listed as "Christendom College" so it would be likely to be a college-owned image uploaded according to the terms of the CC license. Obviously the copyright arrangements between the illustrator, architecture firm and client would be unknown so I would assume the uploader is licensing the image in good faith. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:32, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about List of Reformed Theological Seminary people

Hello, Dclemens1971, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Owain.davies, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, List of Reformed Theological Seminary people, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Reformed Theological Seminary people.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Owain.davies}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

OwainDavies ^(about)_(talk) edited at 10:18, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Dclemens1971. Thank you for your work on John Stephens (bishop). Bastun, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi Dclemens, nice work on your new article. I would suggest adding it to appropriate Wikiprojects, such as Biography and Anglicanism, and adding a 'photo' needed' template. Good job!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 19:34, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Dclemens1971. Thank you for your work on Sione Uluʻilakepa. Moriwen, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Appreciating your good work on Anglican articles like this one! I'm usually over on the Catholic articles myself, and it always bothers me how much less coverage there is on other denominations.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Moriwen}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Moriwen (talk) 16:30, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of recipients of the Order of Jamaica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Howard Gregory.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Bishop Julio Cesar Martin

Thank you for reverting the false information about my resignation. Most appreciated. Did the Anglican Communion Office ask you to correct that?

Again, thank you. 200.68.170.59 (talk) 21:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

No. I have no affiliation or communication with the Anglican Communion Office or any related body. Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi there!

The federal Judiciary just gave a sentence that suspends the government opinion that Treviño is the legal representative and Primate based on gross irregularities and violation of canon law in the "election" of Treviño back in 2022. Therefore legally Moreno is the Primate.

Where can I send you the backing document?

My email jc.martin at hot mail dot com 200.68.169.88 (talk) 21:26, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

To make a change to the Wikipedia page, we would need independent, reliable, secondary sources -- ideally reporting in news/media outlets -- instead of judicial opinions (which would be original research) or Facebook links. If you have any links you can share, English or Spanish, I will take a look. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Let me ask the lawyer...how to upload the document or create a link... It is not a legal opinion, it is a sentence issued by a federal judge. 2806:2F0:7521:F4E9:5490:7F02:696C:B3D8 (talk) 06:26, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

MIAX

Thanks so much for taking the time to review these articles in AfD, especially taking the time to disambiguate between the references to the parent company vs. the exchange. I know that must've been nontrivial effort on your part. I've also incorporated the journal article that you identified into the MIAX Pearl article. Cara Wellington (talk) 17:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Participating in AfD is labor-intensive if we do it right! Thanks for the kind words. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:32, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Dclemens1971, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 21:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Clarifying copyright for Jeff Johnson finding aid

Hello, thanks for reviewing my Jeff Johnson article. I noticed you deleted a significant chunk of my edits due to copyright violation. I put this on the article's talk page, but the Archives West finding aid is CC0, meaning it is public domain. I added the text back because I do not believe it constitutes a copyright violation on Wikipedia. Mathieulalie (talk) 16:19, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

@Mathieulalie I see that now in the endnotes. The article does not follow the WP convention for noting the use of open license material - see instructions here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Adding_open-license_text_to_Wikipedia. Also, I am going to give some time for you or other editors to add more independent, secondary sources, but right now the sources in the article don't support notability for the subject. I would anticipate sending this to Articles for Deletion for a discussion in the next couple weeks if appropriate sources aren't identified. Thanks! Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Could you please explain what specifically the article needs to achieve notability? According to the Wikipedia notability guidelines for biographies, there must be multiple independent reliable sources. I believe the article meets that standard, as I have included excerpts from his biography on the finding aid and multiple articles about him from independent sources. The only time the article relies on primary sources are in quotes or paraphrased quotes. Mathieulalie (talk) 19:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

@Mathieulalie Quick walk through the footnotes: 1/5. Oral histories and personal papers are primary sources (Johnson talking about himself), which cannot be used to verify notability. (If someone else wrote the bio of him, then maybe that's different but it would depend on who wrote the bio, and the default conclusion from the site's language is that the bio originated with him.) You can use this to verify uncontroversial facts but not for notability. 2/7. Ballotpedia is a user-generated source and questionable for notability. 3/9. The Stand is non-independent as a publication of the organization Johnson led and thus unusable for validating notability. 6/8. NW Labor Press is the equivalent of a trade publication, which doesn't go toward notability. See WP:TRADES. Only source 10, the News-Tribune piece, constitutes significant, independent, secondary, reliable coverage of Johnson. Some of these sources can be used to verify information, but only one points to notability and we would need to see more like that. Please review WP:GNG and WP:NBIO for more. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for clarifying. To clarify about the biography from the finding aid, it was not written by Johnson himself, it was written independently by the staff of the Labor Archives of Washington and University of Washington Special Collections (as was everything else in the finding aid). Does that make it qualify for notability? Mathieulalie (talk) 19:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Likely not. First, the source would need to specify the author. Second, I would question the independence of the anyone at the Labor Archives of Washington as a source for this topic, since the organization that Johnson led is listed as a major funder of the archives and Johnson was himself a director of the organization (https://labor.washington.edu/labor-archives#about). The more I look into this, the less likely this subject can be proven notable using the Labor Archives biographical material. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

2026 Asian Para Games

Hello, Dclemens1971,

I was wondering why you converted this article to a redirect when we also have a valid article at 2026 Asian Games. Are the Para Games somehow less important? That AFD you are basing this decision on occurred 6 years ago and this event is now only 2 years away. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:49, 9 May 2024 (UTC)