User talk:Daygum~enwiki

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Daygum~enwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Gary King (talk) 20:57, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Sardinia Artcle

Is there any particular reason why you chose to undo the attempts to fix the grammar on that page (both as your self and as IP 78.13.205.14)? If I was guessing it appears that you are using a translating program to convert Italian to English. Romaioi (talk) 13:33, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Scratch the undoing of grammar comments. I understand what you were trying to do, but you still managed to undo some rectified grammar in the process. Romaioi (talk) 14:06, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

i don't know what you are speaking!!! Daygum (talk) 22:34, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Sardegna

Guarda amico, sto solo cercando di dare organicità al lavoro sulle regioni italiane, che ho fatto praticamente tutte io da zero percbè a nessuno glie ne fotteva niente, e quindi non ho mai trovato qualcuno con cui doverne discutere (tranne con la Sicilia). Nemmeno in questo caso me l'aspettavo, per questo ho cambiato senza dirlo. Trovandomi delle pagine o vuote (tipo 18 regioni su 20) o così incasinate, scritte da un traduttore automatico o in inglese maccheronico etc. come la Sardegna o peggio quella della Sicilia (che sembrava e sembra una pubblicità scadente di un ente turismo e tutt'ora in parte lo è visto che si ostinano a rimetterci le parti che tolgo), appunto le rifaccio da zero che faccio prima. Ma visto che ci sono delle parti a cui tieni se ne può discutere con calma quindi non ti incazzare. Allora te lo ripeto: io non ho cancellato niente nella parte storica, non so di che parli (tranne una cosa sui giudicati che mi sembrava troppo lunga ma vedo che ce l'hai rimessa e comunque appunto bastava dirlo) ma mi sono al 99% solo limitato a correggere la grammatica inglese, se sia un copia incolla non so perchè c'era già. Per il resto nella parte demografica era scritto molto male in inglese, in più devi capire che tutti quei dati che ci hai messo sui centenari natalità fecondità etc. se non ci sono dei riferimenti a dove li hai presi (e non ci sono, specialmente a link in inglese) non hanno nessun valore quindi andranno levati. La cosa della genetica non l'ho assolutamente toccata e non so di cosa parli. Per le immagini: a me le gallery mi fanno vomitare perchè danno l'idea dello spot turistico scadente. Poi rispetto alla mappina morfologica in geograpy secondo me è meglio una foto significativa del paesaggio, almeno come in tutte le altre regioni. Ciao.

--Conte di Cavour (talk) 23:39, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

non so come faccia a dire che non hai modificato la sezione riguardante la storia, visto che qui risultano le tue modifiche: [1]

per quanto riguarda la demografia, i dati sono stati riportati da wikipedia in italiano [2] ogni dato è correlato da note e link che riportano al sito dell' ISTAT Daygum (talk) 22:35, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

June 2009

I explained the situation on Talk:Monte Limbara. What you wrote appears to have been a copy and paste from http://www.bikevillage.it/index.php?pg=51&shn=57, which is normally copyright infringement. However, it appears that their site was copied from the Italian Wikipedia. The two translations could have happened independently, but it seems unlikely. I'm unsure of who translated it now, but it appears not to matter.

When translating material from other languages, please note it in the edit summary, so you give the contributors on that Wikipedia credit. -- Austin512 (talk • contribs 16:58, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Corsica Ferries Sardinia Ferries

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Corsica Ferries Sardinia Ferries, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Corsica Ferries. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:32, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

The name of ferry company is "Corsica Ferries Sardinia Ferries", not "Corsica Ferries" so the title of the previous article is wrong, someone have to correct it Daygum (talk)

I've just redirected the page back to Corsica Ferries. The "move" tab at the top of a page will allow you to move a page (and more importantly it's edit history) to another location. "Copy and paste" moves cause problems in Wikipedia because they lose the edit history of the page.

All that said, "Corsica Ferries" seems to be the name of the company. See Wikipedia:Naming conventions for policy too. --rannṗáirtí anaiṫnid (coṁrá) 14:39, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

(By the way, that was a bot you were responding to above.) --rannṗáirtí anaiṫnid (coṁrá) 14:39, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:38, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of CRS4

A tag has been placed on CRS4 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Basket of Puppies 19:24, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Banco di Sardegna. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A More Perfect Onion (talk) 17:42, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

sicerely i don't know where is the problem??? i wrote references, external links and also bibliography about the page Banco di Sardegna, moreover i don't know because that page about an italian bank could be deleted Daygum (talk)

The page Banco di Sardegna is not up for deletion, just for expansion. Please improve the page to demonstrate notability of the company with good reliable sources, preferably in English. Thank you. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 17:51, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Ethnic groups in Europe

Gentile Daygun noto con dispiacere che nella voce Ethnic groups in Europe nel paragrafo immigrazione storica c'è ancora scritto che è avvenuta un'immigrazione storica di Arabi in Sardegna. Siccome sia lei che io sappiamo benissimo che questo non è vero, perchè non è mai avvennuta nessuna conquista dell'isola ed il breve tentativo di conquista non può definirsi certamente come immigrazione storica. I pochi mesi di permanenza degli Arabi in Sardegna, prima della loro sconfitta, non sono in nessun caso assimilabili alla presenza Araba in Sicilia e Spagna accertata e duratura e sono da considerarsi mesi di guerra. Vorrei ricordarle, ma credo che lei lo sappia già, che in quel periodo chi perdeva la guerra se non riusciva a tornarsene a casa con le navi veniva preso e trucidato. Vorrei chiederle se può fare qualcosa per modificare la voce visto il suo impegno precedente al riguardo. La ringrazio per l'attenzione. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.234.87.172 (talk) 23:08, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

ciao ho visto solo ora il tuo messaggio! tanto non si risolve niente, hanno bloccato la voce in questione, dobbiamo cancellare secoli della nostra storia giudicale, e sottometterci al volere di un gruppo di ignoranti anglofoni, che affermano che intere parti della saregna sono state invase dagli arabi!

Ciao Daygum mi sono permesso di modificare il link alla pagina dei Giudicati perchè erano presenti i simboli )ù che non ne permettevano la consultazione. Ti ringrazio per la risposta che hai dato alla pagina di discussione e per la modifica che hai fatto alla pagina togliendo le parti incriminate. Spero che non annullino la tua modifica e che mantengano le cose come le hai modificate tu. Se ti serve aiuto per qualsiasi cosa chiedimi pure. Grazie ancora ciao Ampsicora (talk) 21:59, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Efisio Arru

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Efisio Arru requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Guillaume2303 (talk) 18:15, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Daygum. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Daygum~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

23:22, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

12:00, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Re

Are you trying to scare me ? i have explained several times why i have removed that portion of the text, check the sources and you will see that i'm right, those groups of people were too few for having an impact on sardinian demography or even culture....that picture is useless, menhir are not even mentioned in the text, explain me why you have removed the picture of the domus de janas then..Note that i wrote most of the two articles (prehistory section of Sardinia while Sardinian people is basically a translantion from my article on the italian wiki) so don't treat me like a troll or somenthing PLEASE! --Xoil (talk) 07:08, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ambra Medda

The article Ambra Medda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article that doesn't establish the subject's notability. My Google News search brought up various interviews, but no independent coverage beyond the trivial.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Huon (talk) 23:27, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Largest cities of Sardinia

Template:Largest cities of Sardinia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 15:25, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Banco di Sardegna logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Banco di Sardegna logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 12:14, 15 June 2022 (UTC)