User talk:Dan.herrick11791
| This user is a student editor in New_England_College/Global_Issues_(Spring_2018) . |
Replies to Questions[edit]
What is due for the next class period in Global Issues: -Read the assigned sections of The Economist -US Geography quiz -post question/comment for each article to Blackboard Mosterbur (talk) 23:58, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Mosterbur
Welcome![edit]
Hello, Dan.herrick11791, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:35, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Homework[edit]
Hi Dan, this is Meghan. I have been in some other classes and even other schools with you. It's nice to see you again. Mccormick022 (talk) 21:46, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]
- Hi Dan.herrick11791! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Mosterbur (talk) 01:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Mosterbur
Neutrality[edit]
Neutrality is providing an unbiased and purely factual view on a topic.
To not take a stand on something, or to present both sides equally. in order to provide objective, unbiased information on a subject.
evaluating sources[edit]
We define good sources as ones that are factual, avoiding ideological slant and bias. often times these are going to be scholarly or peer reviewed sources that are created by experts in the field. Some good examples of reliable sources are
- Peer reviewed journals (New England Journal of Medicine)
- First hand accounts
- etc...
Sources that should be excluded from Wikipedia are...
- Blogs - Only one persons opinion, and usually slanted to that persons views
- unconfirmed news sources - News articles that fail to have multiple sources for each assertion that they make
- Magazines (tabloids, entertainment magazines) - These sources are unreliable because they base their information on rumor.
How has Wikiedu changed wikipedia[edit]
Wikiedu partnerships have increased the reliability of Wikipedia articles because they are increasing the awareness and quality of their authors. Students writing pages for wikiedu are focused on collecting good sources and writing fact based articles on important subjects.