User talk:DEBAISH GHOSH MAJUMDAR

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

DEBAISH GHOSH MAJUMDAR, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi DEBAISH GHOSH MAJUMDAR! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Welcome![edit]

Welcome!

Hello, DEBAISH GHOSH MAJUMDAR, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! – NJD-DE (talk) 11:22, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit requests[edit]

Hello DEBAISH GHOSH MAJUMDAR, welcome to Wikipedia. I went through the edit requests you made at Talk:Economy of India‎, and it was bit difficult to understand which kind of changes you wanted to make. In other cases it was kind of clearer, but I didn't see any reliable sources along with the edit requests. Generally, it's good to not make huge edit requests but to split them. However, could I ask you a favor: Please don't make multiple edit requests for the same change, or with different end result. I believe there were like two or three different posts about the population of India. Happy editing. – NJD-DE (talk) 11:26, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Although others have told you that you have to provide reliable sources if you believe an article needs to be updated, and many of your edits have been reverted, you keep changing Economy of India, Economy of Pakistan, Economy of North Korea, Economy of Sri Lanka, Economy of West Bengal, and other articles. You add, remove or modify numbers, but you never provide sources for your numbers. I checked several of your edits. I only found one edit that was actually correct according to the sources that were given in the article. All your other edits were unsourced or incorrect. Please stop your disruptive editing. Before you contribute to Wikipedia, you have to get acquainted with the rules. Others have posted links to helpful pages. See the sections above here on your user talk page. — Chrisahn (talk) 16:16, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't care DEBAISH GHOSH MAJUMDAR (talk) 10:20, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DEBAISH GHOSH MAJUMDAR,

thank you for updating the data in Wikipedia articles, such as Economy of India and Economy of Pakistan.

Please note:

If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced data to Wikipedia articles, you may be blocked from editing. This may happen without further warning, to prevent damage to the encyclopedia.

If you have questions about verifiability on Wikipedia, feel free to ask for help at the Teahouse at any time.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:24, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Economy of India, you may be blocked from editing. – NJD-DE (talk) 14:47, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 15:20, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DEBAISH GHOSH MAJUMDAR (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Fake information was provided by another IP address named Dineshswamiin so i edited itDEBAISH GHOSH MAJUMDAR (talk) 03:26, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

There seems to be communication difficulties here, which is a problem. You were changing information contrary to the sources and when reverted you continued to make the changes. Before an unblock is considered these problems need to be addressed. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 03:31, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DEBAISH GHOSH MAJUMDAR (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm sorry for not providing the source I'll keep in mind to provide the correct source unblock me please:)DEBAISH GHOSH MAJUMDAR (talk) 03:34, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not convince me. Please provide an example source that meets WP:RS for, say, this edit. Please also address the fact that you removed reliable sources in order to contradict the cited information given. Yamla (talk) 11:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You can check it by yourself it's have been undid by NJD-DE DEBAISH GHOSH MAJUMDAR (talk) 14:46, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying you are unable to provide a reliable source for that and your edit was indeed incorrect, and therefore was correctly reverted by Njd-de? If so, the block would appear to be appropriate. --Yamla (talk) 20:09, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 04:24, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:DEBAISH GHOSH MAJUMDAR, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hayleez (talk) 17:58, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]