User talk:Constanstin

Re:About Me[edit]

Hello my friend I am Sarojupreti and i don't want to be blocked again and again. So, Please help me to unblock my original account. सरोज उप्रेती (talk) 13:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You'll have a hard time actually. Since you were block evading by creating multiple accounts. Ayub407^talk 13:38, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

सरोज उप्रेती, as a friend, i don't want to see you blocked, really, but please do not create another accounts. You're loosing your trust by creating more accounts. Now, i think you're able to edit your talk page, just log in to your account "Sarojupreti" and use. Some (blocked) editors even have no access to edit their own talk page, do not ignore this statement. Your this account will soon be blocked, and note that, checkusers can detect users by their IP addresses.—Constanstin 13:50, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Hey Constanstin. Sarojupreti opened more than one account on Simple English Wikipedia, and is now in the process of being blocked there. I noticed that you had suggested that the user edit there for a period of time before requesting unblock here. Some people just don't get it. Sigh... Etamni | ✉ | ✓ 12:29, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for reviewing my user page. You are the first to review any of the pages created by me. ThanksSilent Hunter^Talk 08:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for reviewing my page[edit]

	The reviewer Barnstar
	Thank you for reviewing my pages. You are the first to do so.Silent Hunter^Talk 13:51, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~Ahah!~~ Thank you, Silent Hunter.—Constanstin 16:07, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, so you created another account.—Constanstin 16:11, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I knew it from the start. but I didn't have any evidence to report at SPI. Ayub407^talk 16:23, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

question[edit]

Is it necessary to create a user page by you name? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Syed Zain Hussain (talk • contribs) 08:12, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Syed Zain Hussain, actually it's your choice, if you want to create your user page, just click Here.—Constanstin 08:25, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have send you an email on wikipedia please reply me there.Syed Zain Hussain (talk) 10:27, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have got an email Syed Zain Hussain (talk) 11:17, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy tagging[edit]

Thanks for patrolling new pages, a vital and under-appreciated task, but please be careful about using WP:CSD#G1 patent nonsense. That is only for things like "4@0%%@{=x!7zz#" or "Yaaaaayyyy LOL!!!" The article Rafael Jaime Castillo Rivera just now only gave his dates of birth and death, but it was quite clear and not nonsense: {{db-person}} was the right tag. People get offended if told what they write was nonsense; also, it is important to select the right speedy tag so that the newbie article author understands the problem and may do better next time. It is worth reading carefully through the definitions at WP:CSD; also, there is good advice from an experienced admin at WP:10CSD and WP:A7M. Keep up the good work! JohnCD (talk) 20:25, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Number of chess grandmasters by country[edit]

I have reverted your proposed deletion of this article. You proposed its deletion under WP:BLP as an unreferenced biography of a living person, but the article is clearly not a biography of a living person, so that PROD category does not pertain. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:14, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WikiDan61, Sorry, i made a mistake. I just clicked on the wrong place.—Constanstin 12:17, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016[edit]

Hello Constanstin. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and content (CSD A3) moments after they are created. It is also suggested that pages that might meet CSD A7 criteria not be tagged for deletion immediately after they are created. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. Jim Carter 15:02, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for telling me, thanks, Jim Carter.—Constanstin 15:22, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Constanstin. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Gestrid (talk) 16:39, 28 July 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Nomination of Jamaican Wikipedia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jamaican Wikipedia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamaican Wikipedia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 04:36, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]