User talk:ClueBot NG/ReviewInterface/Stats

Updates[edit]

Hi. The stats page has not been updated in almost two weeks (since 03:49, 27 December 2010 (UTC)). — $Jeff G. ツ$ 04:29, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now the IP Address that was updating it, 72.14.194.1 (talk · contribs), has been blocked as a proxy. — $Jeff G. ツ$ 18:02, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ruddy thing, I'll look at getting this moved over to the page being updated from ClueBot_NG as an authenticated user so this stops happening. Seems people like to spam stuff from Google app engine now and then. Thanks for pointing it out (: - DamianZaremba ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:45, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Accuracy[edit]

How is "Accuracy" calculated? It might be instructive to have some information about that in the footnote. Thanks. – Wdchk (talk) 19:39, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See the FAQ. Basically we take a whole load of random edits, have them manually reviewed by a number of people then run them though the bot in training mode (does everything apart from the actual reverting) then look at the percentage the bot got wrong compared to humans. - DamianZaremba ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:47, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, this accuracy is the percentage of your classifications that went through as correct -- i.e., others agreed with you. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 22:53, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Facepalm I thought I'd switched back to the user talk page... - DamianZaremba ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:06, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Random Edits[edit]

Some feedback on the "Random Edits" in the queue. I was wondering if there might be some bias built in. A lot of the edits appear to be from around November 3, 2010, which means there is a high proportion of articles related to US politics (because editors were updating them in response to election results). Also, for some reason there seems to be a high proportion of bot edits adding Persondata to articles about people. I have no way of knowing whether these factors might be skewing the sample, but I thought someone might want to know. By the way, let me know if this is not a good place for this type of discussion. I wasn't sure if it would be suitable for somewhere more mainstream, such as User talk:ClueBot Commons. Thanks. – Wdchk (talk) 14:04, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not updated since 7 November 2011[edit]

I'm curious as to my accuracy (plus would like the ego-boo from having my contributions listed here, since I've currently reviewed over a thousand instances). Allens (talk | contribs) 12:47, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review interface submission[edit]

I sent a submission here yesterday and it said if I was accepted then I would receive an email telling me so. I have not received any email, so can I assume I have been rejected? --Philpill691 (talk) 13:52, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]