User talk:Christiern Albertson

This Wikipedian is deceased. Respectful comments of remembrance may be left below.

I have made many changes and additions to the Lil Hardin Armstrong biography. They are all based upon her own unpublished autobiography, which we collaborated on, but never got to finish. I don't know how else to reference my changes--we were close friends for the last 10 years of her life. Christiern Albertson 01:21, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Belated welcome[edit]

As no one else seems to have extended you an official Wikipedia welcome yet, let me take care of that now. Welcome!

Hello, Christiern Albertson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Cheers, -- Infrogmation 01:26, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I guess you have figured out that Fred Nurdley and I (Chris Albertson) are one and the same. I tried to change the user name, but had to re-register as Christiern Albertson (my full name, the system would not accept "Chris"). I notice that there have been several attempts to vandalize the Bessie biography and I hope my input is not regarded as such. I should mention that I question the assertion that William Smith brought 2 mulattos to the household. I don't see a reference for that information and it does not get a single mention in any of the many interviews I conducted with Bessie's family and school mates.

Bessie Smith[edit]

Hi, thanks for your email. I deleted the link, and others, because of the guidelines at WP:NOT and WP:EL. Specifically, that wikipedia is not a link directory. If the information in the website is useful, try to incorporate it into the article. If you want to reply, please do on my talkpage as I almost missed your email. Thanks Belovedfreak 18:02, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bessie Smith[edit]

Hi. I'm not sure why, but the articles about African-Americans seem to suffer from vandalism more than some of the others (and it's usually not racist vandalism). I don't know why the anonymous editor is so persistent about the census data. Census data of the time is notorious unreliable with respect to African-Americans; most of the census-takers were white and shared common attitudes of their day toward Blacks. The fact that this editor is anonymous, cites proprietary data, and is disparaging toward family members and a marriage license makes me suspicious, but I'm just a fan; I don't have any facts to cite as counter-evidence. — Malik Shabazz | Talk 16:49, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Lil Armstrong portrait (cropped).jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Lil Armstrong portrait (cropped).jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:10, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Chris Albertson 2006.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Chris Albertson 2006.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot 14:06, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Chris Albertson 2006.JPG[edit]

Image:Chris Albertson 2006.JPG

Do you hold the copyright on this image to the extent of being legaly able to release it under a free license.Genisock2 00:54, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is a picture taken by a friend using my camera--what kind of proof do I need to use it????? Christiern Albertson 23:17, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Get them to email permissions@wikimedia.org saying they are okey with a release under the GFDL.Genisock2 21:51, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Weston, who took the picture, passed away a month later. - This is really ludicrous. Christiern Albertson 05:01, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If there are no conflicting claims to who might own the copyright, I think simply stating something like photo of me, taken by (name) on my camera by my request. and I own rights to this photo and hereby authorize use under the GFDL license or some variation on that as apporpriate. Sorry for the hassle; problems caused by some editors who have violated copyrights made necessary such bureaucracy sometimes inconveniencing good faith editors such as yourself. Let me know if I can be of help. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 15:45, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: Material such as the Lil Hardin Armstrong publicity photos, when created in the USA and the original publication had no assertion of copyright, are indeed public domain per US law. If such is the case, just clearly note where you got the original (eg, "I scanned this from an original given to me by so and so") and tag them with Template:PD-Pre1978. Thanks, -- Infrogmation 16:06, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for clairifying the situation.Genisock2 (talk) 00:35, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flag at Bessie Smith[edit]

I noticed you undid the edit I made with an edit summary stating that she was an American. You are right of course that she was an American, but current consensus seems to be that we can better call her an American than an American. The former is perfectly understandable to the reader and the country article is only a click away if the reader wishes to see what the flag looks like. The latter adds nothing, risks over-emphasising nationality, and is (in this case) historically wrong too. WP:FLAGS will give chapter and verse on the subject. Best wishes, --John 07:27, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you're interested here is the flag at the time of her birth and here is how it looked when she died. The current flag came in on 4 July 1960. See Flag of the United States for details. --John 07:32, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why delete Billie Holiday discography?[edit]

The link doesn't meet WP:EL. Its not in English, it is a clear conflict of interest since it was added by the author of the site, there is already a discography linked from the article so its a duplication. Please note that Wikipedia is not a link directory. If there is a compelling reason to include the link that is consistent with WP:EL it can be replaced. Gwernol 23:13, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Louis Cottrell, Jr.[edit]

Thought you might find this article interesting. (Hope you still checkin here.) Lionelt (talk) 17:10, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. A photo credited to you has been listed for deletion for uncertain copyright status; see Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cottrell Trio.jpeg. Thank you. Infrogmation (talk) 21:27, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]