User talk:Chhandama/Archive 2

Proposed deletion of Science Vision

The article Science Vision has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Impossible to find any sources except "getCited" and similar (which are user contributed and not considered reliable sources, not even a home page. Not listed in WorldCat or JournalSeek. Does not meet WP:Notability (academic journals) or WP:N.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 16:44, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Moniezia expansa

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Moniezia expansa, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.goatbiology.com/animations/moniezia.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:57, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Internal links

Hi. Thanks for your great work on creating and editing multiple articles on parasitic worms. However, when adding internal links, please keep in mind the Wikipedia linking guidelines, and especially the section on overlinking: Normally, each term should be linked only once in the main text of an article (though it's OK to duplicate some links in the lead section). Thanks, Hqb (talk) 08:20, 1 May 2010 (UTC)