User talk:Cdmlb84

April 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Well drilling because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 19:29, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not allowed to show examples of well drilling companies and their works? Cdmlb84 (talk) 19:37, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bill Kyte Well Drilling (April 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bill Kyte Well Drilling and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 22:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)

reliable

secondary

strictly independent of the subject

You make it.

That would count for all the above.

You can also make the other 4 or 5 other business history articles I have to make

because apparently I'm not allowed to even if I state COIs on my profile

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements) - you can research it all google it

Sussex Corner, Sussex, Penobsquis, Pearsonville, Fredericton, Moncton, Saint John, etc, rest of the NB province of Canada

Can't wait to see you write the history of each thing and the companies and the other 4 or 5 pages I have to make.

reliable - you work from home on the internet for wiki can't get more reliable

secondary - you are secondary

strictly independent of the subject - you are not part of the subject and do not get paid by the subject

Good luck. Cdmlb84 (talk) 02:05, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cdmlb84! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 22:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]