User talk:Ccppjj

March 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Historical Jesus. and Race and appearance of Jesus. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Stop adding this, and don't stick in in edit summaries either. Switching to a named account is not going ot help. Either provide a reliable source for this apparent hoax or leave it alone. Meters (talk) 18:35, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

I've never heard of such a letter, when such a letter would obviously be of extreme historical value. We need WP:RS that discuss this letter and not random websites or the pdf of the letter as well. Harizotoh9 (talk) 20:03, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Historical Jesus, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". No, calling it a minor edit is not going to help either. Meters (talk) 18:48, 28 March 2020 (UTC)