User talk:Brendan129

Welcome!

Hello, Brendan129, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! AKRadecki 18:27, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Eleanor Bumpers. Please be more careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gscshoyru 13:40, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quotes[edit]

Hello, Brendan129. Regarding this edit you made to the Death of Caylee Anthony article, I reverted because...as I stated in this edit summary: "That's part of the quote. It's clear that it's an opinion, just like the others, because it's quoted to a specific person."

We shouldn't alter quotes unless altering them in a way that doesn't change the original meaning, such as using a bracket to specify who the source is talking about in place of "him" or "her" or "he" or "she." Flyer22 (talk) 06:08, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Spf121188. I noticed that you recently removed content from New York Post without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Before removing a well sourced statement, you need to bring it to the talk page to gather consensus. SPF121188 ^{(talk this way)} ^(contribs) 19:20, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023[edit]

Hi, I saw you made the very bold change of adding "justifiably" to the first sentence of "Shooting of Michael Brown" without giving any reason or edit description, not to mention no consensus. Please read WP:POV, as this clearly violates guidelines, especially for an insanely controversial event such as this one. Thanks. TheXuitts (talk) 04:34, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The subsequent investigations by both local law enforcement agencies, as well as the Justice Department cleared Officer Wilson of any wrongdoing, as well as pointing out that many witness statements were fabricated, and that michael Brown was attempting to disarm the officer. This is addressed in other sections of the article, and therefore, makes the shooting justified both procedurally, and in the eyes of the law. Brendan129 (talk) 22:46, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]