User talk:Braelynn2000

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Braelynn2000, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:21, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Braelynn2000, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 22:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WCI Peer Review[edit]

It was easy to understand the topic of Epistrocacy, however, when you were explaining your three main tenets, I would suggest changing the structure (to a bulletin board for example) so that the reader doesn't get lost with where he is reading or mix up the words with each other. I also would suggest you do the same for the six possible forms of epistocracy. Alihawatmeh (talk) 14:17, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback! I appreciate how thorough you were with your review of what little I had written. I think your suggestion to refer to Springer is a good one, and it would substantiate my claim that utilitarianism is popular and persuasive. I definitely will add more content to this section. I may also edit another section of the article and keep in mind all of your comments as I do so. Thanks!HarryJL (talk) 17:46, 10 October 2021 (UTC)HarryJL[reply]