User talk:Ben 2cette
| This user is a student editor in Salem_State_University/Media_Literacy_(Fall_2018) . |
Possible Revisions[edit]
Just providing a few suggestions for improvement to this Wikipedia article as assigned by my college media class. I mean no disrespect and I hope I do not come off as disparaging or overcritical with my comments. My intent is only to be concise and constructive. In the beginning of the Wikipedia article there is little information, really only a thesis statement. The beginning statement doesn’t cite where the information was received from. The only part of the introduction section cited is the definition of “medium” at the end. This website, http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic500286.files/Fraser%20%20Rethinking%20the%20Public%20Sphere.pdf As cited in the References section of the article as, “31. Fraser, Nancy (1990). "Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy" (PDF). Social Text. Duke University Press (25/26): 56. doi:10.2307/466240. JSTOR 466240. It says that, “The iSites platform has been retired.” The link, https://www.boundless.com/sociology/textbooks/boundless-sociology-textbook/government-15/democracy-115/public-sphere-and-civil-society-643-8268/, cited as number 9 in References, redirected to the main page of this website: https://www.boundless.com/ which is an immigration website, entirely different from the Boundless textbook company. The link, http://eds.a.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=bbe2544c-0ab4-418f-9faf-f44ef1b747b9%40sessionmgr4009&vid=0&hid=4105, cited as number 6 in References was unable to come up, saying that it was due to an internal server error. While the previous two examples, specifically the last one, may have been due to my own computer and not all cases, it still may be a situation that would apply to others, and as a result, perhaps different links may prove to be more useful to those trying to access the sources.
Ben 2cette (talk) 15:07, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Restriction in Media[edit]
Restrictions in media may exist either directly or indirectly. Before internet usage of media as well as social media became prominent, ordinary citizens rarely had much control over media. Even as the usage of social media has increased, major corporations still maintain the primary control over media as they are acquiring more and more platforms that would be considered in public use today [32]. Media has been compared in the sense that it is the usage of media that determines how the content is considered, rather than the actual messages of the content. According to the Alec Charles edited Media/Democracy, “It is not the press or television or the internet or even democracy itself that is good or bad. It is what we do with them that makes them so” [33]. The role government plays in media and the regulations and restrictions in media has been debated upon as well. The government involvement in media is possibly due to distrust between the government and media, as the government has criticized media before. Partial blame for distrust between the government and the public on both sides often goes to media as the public may feel as though there is false information though media and the government may feel as though media is giving the public false information [34]. These functions of media in the way that it exists is described in a review of Victor Pickard’s book, America’s Battle for Media Democracy: The Triumph of Corporate Libertarianism and the Future of Media Reform, where Josh Shepperd wrote, “If one approaches the historical question of media ownership from a public service model, the private emphasis of the system requires praise for its innovations and self-sustainability, but deserves deep interrogation for its largely uncontested claim that the system, as is, provides the best opportunity for social recognition” [35].
32. Mack, Robert L. Ott, Brian L. (2014). Critical Media Studies: An Introduction Second Edition. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
33. Charles, A. (2013). Media/Democracy : A Comparative Study. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Retrieved from http://corvette.salemstate.edu:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=cookie,ip,cpid&custid=ssc&db=nlebk&AN=632062&site=eds-live&scope=site
34. Cammaerts, B., & Carpentier, N. (2007). Reclaiming the Media : Communication Rights and Democratic Media Roles. Bristol, UK: Intellect. Retrieved from http://corvette.salemstate.edu:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=cookie,ip,cpid&custid=ssc&db=nlebk&AN=179161&site=eds-live&scope=site
35. Shepperd, J. (2016). Victor Pickard, America's Battle for Media Democracy: The Triumph of Corporate Libertarianism and the Future of Media Reform. International journal of communication [Online], 4723+. Retrieved from http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A491909998/LitRC?u=mlin_n_state&sid=LitRC&xid=c0249fc4
Ben 2cette (talk) 18:04, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Welcome![edit]
Hello, Ben 2cette, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:21, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Restrictions in Media[edit]
Restrictions in media may exist either directly or indirectly. Before internet usage of media as well as social media became prominent, ordinary citizens rarely had much control over media. Even as the usage of social media has increased, major corporations still maintain the primary control over media as they are acquiring more and more platforms that would be considered in public use today [32]. Media has been compared in the sense that it is the usage of media that determines how the content is considered, rather than the actual messages of the content. According to the Alec Charles edited Media/Democracy, “It is not the press or television or the internet or even democracy itself that is good or bad. It is what we do with them that makes them so” [33]. The role government plays in media and the regulations and restrictions in media has been debated upon as well. The government involvement in media is possibly due to distrust between the government and media, as the government has criticized media before. Partial blame for distrust between the government and the public on both sides often goes to media as the public may feel as though there is false information though media and the government may feel as though media is giving the public false information [34]. These functions of media in the way that it exists is described in a review of Victor Pickard’s book, America’s Battle for Media Democracy: The Triumph of Corporate Libertarianism and the Future of Media Reform, where Josh Shepperd wrote, “If one approaches the historical question of media ownership from a public service model, the private emphasis of the system requires praise for its innovations and self-sustainability, but deserves deep interrogation for its largely uncontested claim that the system, as is, provides the best opportunity for social recognition” [35].
32. Mack, Robert L. Ott, Brian L. (2014). Critical Media Studies: An Introduction Second Edition. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
33. Charles, A. (2013). Media/Democracy : A Comparative Study. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Retrieved from http://corvette.salemstate.edu:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=cookie,ip,cpid&custid=ssc&db=nlebk&AN=632062&site=eds-live&scope=site
34. Cammaerts, B., & Carpentier, N. (2007). Reclaiming the Media : Communication Rights and Democratic Media Roles. Bristol, UK: Intellect. Retrieved from http://corvette.salemstate.edu:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=cookie,ip,cpid&custid=ssc&db=nlebk&AN=179161&site=eds-live&scope=site
35. Shepperd, J. (2016). Victor Pickard, America's Battle for Media Democracy: The Triumph of Corporate Libertarianism and the Future of Media Reform. International journal of communication [Online], 4723+. Retrieved from http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A491909998/LitRC?u=mlin_n_state&sid=LitRC&xid=c0249fc4