User talk:BaronJuJu

Regarding edits made during March 13 2007[edit]

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Majorly _{(o rly?)} 19:12, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The guy is on a blatant smear campaign in which he brags about on other forums. Take a look at the SOE, SWG and John Smedley pages and see the comments from others there. He is on nothing more than a vendetta. I apologize for deleteing it, but I did edit it after it was reposted to take out the personal attacks. BaronJuJu 19:30, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SWG Attacks[edit]

Report it to an administrator. Antman -- chat 07:34, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How? I did a Admin Vandalism report on him yesterday but he is still on spamming the crap out of the page. Is there another avenue to take? BaronJuJu 17:52, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may find this helpful: WP:RAA. Lists the possible admin questions you may have. Hope one of them proves appropriate. -- GJD 17:55, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reference. That helped immensely and bookmarked for future reference.BaronJuJu 22:37, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SWG edits[edit]

Apologies if I caused any conflicting edits. I was merely drawn to the issue as I've had to deal with Jonawiki (talk · contribs) and Magonaritus (talk · contribs) inserting POV and highly baised edits at Upper Canada College, and noted "they"'re doing the same at SWG. I'm just trying to remove a lot of the speculation and editorialising, as well as putting the cites into a proper format. --G2bambino 17:19, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no, no apologies needed. It's completely understandable with those two. You can delete thoses edits I made. I thought they were staying in. I am all for removing that garbage.BaronJuJu 17:21, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]