User talk:Awilson107/sandbox
Here is what I posted for my evaluation for the article assignment. Feedback would be great. "This article provides a fair starting point in understanding the practice of 'sitting on a man'. It does not, however, offer much detailed information on the practice, and does not note the effectiveness of it. The sources in the article are strong, but are not utilized to much extent in the article. A suggestion for improving the article would be to ultimately elaborate on some concepts which are mentioned, such as explaining what Warrant Chiefs are. It would be helpful to explain why they were targets of the practice during times of colonization, or at minimum link a source which will explain what they are, as someone who is not previously familiar with the content may be unaware of such information. The information presented in the article does not reflect the current state of the practice, so it is not fully up to date, though the sources are reliable and the links are functioning. Awilson107 (talk) 16:53, 4 February 2017 (UTC)"
Peer Review: I think you should add a small snippet about the women's war and not just a link. I also think some of the article is still ab it vague as to what "sitting on a man" is. I think some more outside sources would help to show more perspectives. Jeaneolivera (talk) 21:35, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
I like this article. Especially about the background information. However, I believe you guys should continue to add some more information of the other topics. Mcarvalho1 (talk) 00:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Main Theory not included[edit]
The main arguments of the book does not show what type of dissent led to the violent protest that killed several women and why. Also it will be much better if the contributors don't go back and forth in their sandbox.