User talk:Arkansore

Speedy deletion nomination of World Class Schools Quality Mark[edit]

Hello, Arkansore,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Pppery and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, World Class Schools Quality Mark, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Pppery}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:52, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest that if you have at least three independent reliable sources with significant coverage of the school to summarize, that you submit a draft via Articles for Creation, so that it can be determined if it is substantially different before it is part of the encyclopedia. 331dot (talk) 16:12, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Finham Park 2[edit]

Hello, Arkansore,

Thank you for creating Finham Park 2.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Notability for organisations (which includes schools) requires significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources. The article only cites primary sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DoubleGrazing}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 21:17, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonas Ball (November 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Thatguy1987 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jonas Ball and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thatguy1987 (talk) 18:27, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arkansore! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Thatguy1987 (talk) 18:27, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GAs[edit]

Thanks for reviewing Rancho Bravo Tacos. I don't see Wikipedia:Good articles/Agriculture, food and drink updated yet, but hopefully soon. I've also nominated Daily Dozen Doughnut Company if you enjoy reviewing food/drink nominations. Either way, happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:51, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lindley Hall Farm[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lindley Hall Farm you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 18:01, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment[edit]

Rancho Bravo Tacos has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. An anonymous username, not my real name 02:02, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lindley Hall Farm[edit]

The article Lindley Hall Farm you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Lindley Hall Farm for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 02:24, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hello, My Name Is Dick Licker[edit]

The article Hello, My Name Is Dick Licker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM, zero reviews found in a BEFORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 16:22, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hello, My Name Is Dick Licker for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hello, My Name Is Dick Licker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hello, My Name Is Dick Licker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 20:37, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Szechaun-Sauce.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Szechaun-Sauce.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dick Licker.jpeg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dick Licker.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Szechaun-Sauce.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Szechaun-Sauce.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:51, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of Internet phenomena, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. silvia (User:BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4) (inquire within) 20:32, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jonas Ball[edit]

Hello, Arkansore. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jonas Ball, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:45, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jonas Ball[edit]

Hello, Arkansore. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jonas Ball".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:34, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive[edit]

Good article nominations \| August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Among Us Chicken Nugget.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Among Us Chicken Nugget.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 05:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive[edit]

Good article nominations \| March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]