User talk:Archjr

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Valermos 06:06, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to add nonsense and personally attack people on wikipedia, you will be banned from editing. --Valermos 06:47, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Removing signed user comments is also considered vandalism... Consider this your last warning. --Valermos 07:09, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I was just removing it because it was stupid and I was tired of vandalism hurting Wikipedia.Archjr

This page has been blanked as a courtesy.

Enough of this[edit]

OK. It is time for the joking to end. You are potentially offending people, both people here in the Wikipedia community and the wider readership. What you are doing could be seen as vandalism and you could get blocked from editing Wikipedia for it.

You might not get another warning before having a block imposed. So be careful and be serious from here on in.

And stop making personal attacks while you're at it. In fact, I have a question I'd like a straight answer on: do you intend to make serious edits to Wikipedia? -- SCZenz 07:24, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a serious edit for you - Arch Hall Jr. sucks. That real enough for ya? Archjr

Not really. I have to say I can't see why, if you plan to use this account only for attacks and vandalism, it shouldn't be blocked. The question, really, is will you or will you not continue to delete material from articles, create hoax pages, and attack users? -- SCZenz 07:48, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Gosh, you're right, that sentence was overcomplicated. But, since you know what I meant perfectly well, you can answer the question. -- SCZenz 07:57, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

YES!!!!(Way to delete my signed comment. Nice double standard.)Archjr

I was reverting you edit of my comment, which was most definitely inappropriate. I didn't think it necessary to make sure to maintain your snarky comments; if you haven't noticed, I'm in the middle of being lenient and offering you a chance to be productive. -- SCZenz 08:04, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You're blocked[edit]

Since you've declined to give me a straight answer to my question, I've blocked you for 8 hours for your past vandalism. If you intend to use this account productively in the future, saying so would be a good idea. -- SCZenz 08:14, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CVU status[edit]

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 15:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:Archjr[edit]

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Alexius08 (talk) 10:21, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]