User talk:Aquadeias
If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
Thank you!
| This is Aquadeias's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Welcome from Vatsan34[edit]
|
|
Talk Page[edit]
Hello Wikipedians, This is my talk page. Feel Free to message me by typing things after this sentence. Aqua deias
HI[edit]
Well,you appear on user creation log once you create a new account! You too can welcome new users! Join Wikipedia:Welcoming committee and start welcoming new users!
For user creation log,seehere.
Don't worry , be happy! Vatsan34 (talk) 06:35, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Button's record[edit]
I added it because I thought it was interesting, like the way his Monaco victory was the first time one engine had one three straight races in modern F1. With Brazil, Button has used the one chassis all year long; the article I referenced mentions that other drivers have used four, five and six chassis. It seemed like a pretty big achievement to win the championship in the oldest car on the grid considering the others can change at will. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 12:18, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Re: Interlagos map[edit]
First, the old map had an out of date name. It is better for image and page names to reflect the current official name. There does happen to be a way for sysops to do that (finally!!!), but there were more problems. My map provides more data and is more accurate. I test each map in Google Earth as an overlay. So I can assure you it is accurate. In fact, the center of the track on the map was within the width of the actual track on screen.
Second, you mentioned image looking bad. Part of that maybe my style. However, part is due to two aspects. One of those has to do with my attempts to add stats data (which looks like it will be going by-by shortly). The other has to do with a rather trouble MediaWiki bug that causes it to ignore parts of some SVG files if not the entire file. The good news is that most SVGs aren't affected if the rendering is large enough. In this case, it trips up around 150px. For best results, keep that image larger than that. Will (Talk - contribs) 12:02, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
2009 Sepang Grand Prix listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2009 Sepang Grand Prix. Since you had some involvement with the 2009 Sepang Grand Prix redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Falcadore (talk) 05:21, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
2009 Nüerburging Grand Prix listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2009 Nüerburging Grand Prix. Since you had some involvement with the 2009 Nüerburging Grand Prix redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Falcadore (talk) 05:21, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
You should be familiar enough with this by now. --Falcadore (talk) 05:21, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Latest F1 season
A tag has been placed on Template:Latest F1 season, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
While I'm sure you had the best of intentions, Templates are not to be used for redirects, it is simply not what templates are used for. Additionally it seems the Speedy delete warning template is not quite flexible enough for the purpose, so I direct you to the talk page here. --Falcadore (talk) 03:30, 26 October 2009 (UTC) Aquadeias (talk) 05:53, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Scuderia Ferrari Malbaro listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Scuderia Ferrari Malbaro. Since you had some involvement with the Scuderia Ferrari Malbaro redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Falcadore (talk) 07:29, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Enough with the mis-spellings and non-English spellings please. There are entire Wikipedias dedicated to each language. This one is devoted to the English language. --Falcadore (talk) 07:29, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Blocking[edit]
You're not allowed to block any users, and juding from some of the warnings you've given in the past, you seem to need more experience in Wikipedia guidelines before even considering blocking anyway.
Your signature is also excessively long and needs to be shortened. Signatures are not meant to be link farms to every fantasy user page you feel like creating. See WP:SIG#Length. IIIVIX (Talk) 07:21, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
- I also suggest, since we're already on the subject of things you should not be doing, that you have a look at what your user page should not be used for. This appears to be the sign of something bigger you have planned. However it is also quite clear that this has absolutely nothing to do with improving Wikipedia. We are not a hosting service for fantasy racing. Please do not continue to add such pages. IIIVIX (Talk) 07:31, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Template:F1 Gp 00-09[edit]
I thought to change its name to Template:F1 GP 00-10 Wild mine (talk) 16:56, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
Template:Aquadeias has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. IIIVIX (Talk) 10:07, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Your behaviour[edit]
Your recent behaviour on Wikipedia was brought to my attention through a couple RFDs where several editors expressed their concern over the redirects you were creating. I then came to your talk page to see other notifications that pages you were creating were being nominated for deletion, amongst other warnings from people. Ideally, we ask people to be bold, but I think you should probably take things a bit slower. If your behaviour doesn't improve, you might be blocked for disruptive editing. Let me know if you have any questions. Killiondude (talk) 05:59, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Haryanto/FBMW Pacific[edit]
For FBMW Pacific results, cycle through here. Cs-wolves(talk) 15:50, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Repost of Template:Infobox Aquadeias[edit]
A tag has been placed on Template:Infobox Aquadeias requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. IIIVIX (Talk) 12:54, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of 2009 Macau FBMW Pacific[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing, 2009 Macau FBMW Pacific, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Macau FBMW Pacific. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Falcadore (talk) 07:01, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Restaurant City (Facebook)[edit]
A tag has been placed on Restaurant City (Facebook) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — ækTalk 10:11, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Your user pages[edit]
It's certainly not clear cut or anything, but pages in your user space, particularly User:Aquadeias/S.Vettel may violate the Wikipedia:User pages policy due to the excessive unrelated content. I'd suggest cutting it down a bit. Just some friendly advice. Kuguar03 (talk) 04:50, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)