User talk:Anipilot
License tagging for Image:BHI.gif[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:BHI.gif. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:04, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding this image and writing the description! In the future, please try to add the correct image copyright tag. You can see a whole list of them at the links above. Or, feel free to ask me for help or ask for help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions Thanks for your contribution - happy editing! Verloren Hoop 20:47, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:BHI.gif[edit]
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:BHI.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:03, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 17:03, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Bhi x2 lg small.gif[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Bhi x2 lg small.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:06, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Weatherford[edit]
Don't just ass-u-me that putting in a Wikilinki to Weatherford takes you to the right article....WikiDon 10:22, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
- No, it is common Wikietiquette for the person who puts in the link (weather internal, interwiki, or external), to "test" the link and make sure 1) it works; 2) it goes the intended place. It is also common courtesy not to create re-directs. You want the reader to have a seamless transition while reading. If they get directed to the wrong place, 1) they get frustrated, and 2) Wikipedia loses credibility. If there is an article called: Weatherford International you link to that. If there is not, then, yes, you can make a dead-red link, but you try to avoid these. In addition, if there is a Weatherford International and you don't link to it, it makes you look like you have a POV, like you work for Baker Hughes, and are only worried about making them look good, and to heck with the competition. If a credible contributor adds a link, they test that link. I may create a whole new article, and in it put in 30 Wikilinkis, and I may get tired and forget to test each and every one of them, but I try. And, if I am just editing an article, and just adding a link or two, I ALWAYS test it. Remember, while doing your work and keep the reader in mind, make it easy for them to 1) get the info, 2) make Wikipedia a trusted resource. And if you come across mistake links, like they one they put in Halliburton, you fix it. Thanks...WikiDon 21:13, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Gaveshini.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Gaveshini.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 10:06, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Gaveshini.jpg[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gaveshini.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly hi! 16:39, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Sagar kanya2.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Sagar kanya2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:48, 9 June 2016 (UTC)